A Guide to Successful Marriage is a book by Albert Ellis and Robert Allan Harper, published in 1961. The book, which is 288 pages long, was first published on January 1, 1967, and is available for purchase on Amazon.com. Ellis, an American psychologist and psychotherapist, founded the rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT) movement, which focuses on the belief that emotions come from conscious thought as well as internalized ideas. The book was first published in 1940 and has been translated into multiple languages.
Although Ellis was born on September 27, 1913, in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, he never experienced health issues. He was the author of Sex and the Liberated Man, Sex Without Guilt, and Sex Without Guilt in the Twenty-First Century. Despite his health issues, Ellis never gave up on his goal of having a successful marriage.
The book is available in paperback format and has received positive reviews from readers. It is a valuable resource for those interested in understanding the principles of successful marriage and the role of emotional intelligence in achieving it. The book is also available for purchase on Amazon.com.
In summary, A Guide to Successful Marriage is a valuable resource for those interested in understanding the principles of successful marriage and the role of emotional intelligence in achieving it.
📹 Albert Ellis: A Guide to Rational Living – Thinking Allowed DVD w/ Jeffrey Mishlove
Start today. Cancel any time. Use promo code THINKNOW for a 50% discount on your first month. NOTE: This is an excerpt from …
📹 21 Ways to Stop Worrying by Dr Albert Ellis, 1991
Lecture given by Dr Ellis in 1991, Albert Ellis Institute Also see: How to be a perfect non-perfectionist …
This 9 min 15 sec article change the course of my life and has had me living at a much higher level with a consistent joy that is now such a rock solid part of who I am…I dare say it is nearly indestructible. It has been severely tested with personal illness and tragedy that would of put the old me into a state of despair. I believe the only thing that can destroy it would be some kind of mental illness that erodes, corrupts or destroys this operating system I built…ie: Alzheimers, dementia etc. And that is the analogy I would use that Albert is conveying here. You need to remove and delete the old operating system given to you by yourself, your environment, parents and the world etc and install the new operating system with this philosophy/idea/rationality as the core component
Interesting point! But the idea is not to ignore or accept real adversity–it’s to free oneself to respond to it rationally rather than self-destructively. Accepting rather than emotionally rejecting adversity is a first step toward handling it. A depressed person says of oppression, “This can’t be happening. I can’t function if this is happening,” and goes to bed. A person with better emotional tools says, “Oppression is here. What can I do?” Denial and acceptance are very different things.
I appreciate Albert Ellis creating a new therapeutic school of thought and paving the way for CBT. He was undoubtedly an innovative thinker. I’m not sure why he’s underrated. Perhaps it’s because he’s not exactly soft-spoken. I don’t mind that because he’s upfront and direct. Psychology is ultimately rooted in philosophy, and the two are subjective. The history of humanity has shown that people are always searching for knowledge and ways to live a better life, and Albert Ellis was certainly contributing to that age-old quest.
REBT doesn’t invalidate those responses. It does, however, force people to find out if those responses are helpful and – if they’re not helpful – gives a way for getting into a more helpful response set. I think that there’s a limit on what can be done with this method of working. Everything has limits. But – for most things, it’s been demonstrated to be very efficacious.
What qualification are you doing or going to be doing? Hopefully it’s a mixed type of course that allows you to find a method that – whilst being scientifically sound – still lets you decide somewhat on the methods you’ll use. BTW, if you want to understand the sorts of things at the belief stage in Ellis’ ABC-DEmodel, you might wanna check out George Kelly’s Personal Construct Psychology… seriously canny stuff, that is!
I’m about to start studying towards becoming a counsellor and while I find Ellis interesting, I’m not entirely sure it is as practical as people suggest. For me, the person centred approach works best as it doesn’t invalidate the inherent fear and dread within clients which REBT seems to. I’m all for people changing problematic aspects of their thinking but personally i find the Person centred approach more helpful in that process. REBT is still fascinating though.
Being stuck in a desert and knowing its irrational to demand an oasis does not remove the pain of dying from thirst and lack of water. Cbt can be great to change behavior which is not efficient but I dont know how effective it is in making people feel better about deprivation which are not chosen beliefs but inborn biological desires which cannot be switched on and off like a light switch. I find mindfulness oriented and motivational oriented therapies much more honest. You cant just change what you value and how much you value it by virtue of rationality and knowledge alone you can know death is a reality for all people does not make loss less painful or less frightening if confronting it via direct experience ACT more honest more compassionate and I feel better suited for people experiencing real problems and to the extent problems are not real cbt does a better job. Of confronting And disputing false beliefs via empirical evidence rather than focusing on forcing a stoic philosophy on people
What REBT sounds like to me is an ideal paradigm for oppression. If there were a legitimate cause of a person’s distress and you were trying to ignore that fact, you would tell them that it’s all in their head, that they could become happy & rich through pure willpower if they /really/ wanted it, so it’s their fault they don’t. While people have some problems that are self-made, other people have complicated economic and social barriers such as poverty and the oppression of women & blacks.
Funny I studies roman and greek stocis and came tom similar conclusions about emotional and mental self control almost identical to what Ellis talks about. I taught myself to never feel depressed and sad especial towards things beyond my control and never dwell on anything because its pointless and often the object of concern is trivial and unimportant in the scheme of things. Unfortunately I’ve become somewhat nihilistic as a result. Nihilism is a slippery slope. don t buy into it.
Hm interesting. Having no clinical experience as a psychologist, I wouldn’t recognize the typical perspectives On the other hand, there is physical oppression which is unknown to the average person The carcinogens & endocrine disruptors found in everyday household items give people extreme health problems which are seldom identified correctly. More generally, pollutants and industry toxins which make us miserable. Corporations often make decisions to include these harmful items to attain profit
Comes off as rather arrogant, dismissing the whole concept of parental and childhood influences, schemes, dismissing Freud and so forth, ultimately seeing the person only as a dull machine. Not that Freud’s theory is the best but it did have some excellent points, especially on reverting to earlier developmental stages, previous conflicts. I just feel he overdid it emphasizing the whole oral- anal etc stages.
Dr. Ellis didn’t believe in GD. Or an afterlife, but I would accept his opinion. I believe; he is still working and helping people on the other side. He was a special soul he wrote many books and was successful in his life. He didn’t care about the material things in life. The main objective was helping people getting through there anxiety and their life travel in the earthly realm. He Must have gotten his angel wings from the most highest.
54:15 coping statements: I never have to do well, but it would be preferable. I can cope with stressors and adversities in the environment and usually they not always do well. I never need absolutely under all conditions what I want. I will always to some degree fall on my face, be rejected do stupid things because I’m a failable human and there is no way I’m ever gonna be perfect and infailable.
Learned helplessness theory contradicts ret the only reason why any helplessness would cause worry or depression in ret if the outcome is defined as essential but given helplessness theory is experimentally shown wondering if it proves we have far less control to define an event or outcome as good bad or indifferent at will as ret seem to imply
As a group of Counselors we went to his Manhattan office for a lecture and demonstration when he was in his 80s and wheelchair bound with a number of assistants. Our volunteer was a biracial young lady who avoided black people, felt only politely tolerated by her so called white friends and had one friend in life…her dog….. who died last week. Paraprharasing Ellis – People disappointed you because they should always accept you?” That would be nice. “Does life always have to be nice or it’s unbearable? ” I think so. “So you wish that people liked you more?” Yes. “And what happens if they don’t? ” That’s bad. “What if you were to say that I want to be liked by my friends, but if they reject me, forget them. I’m still a valuable person? What if you tried that?” I an not sure.