Royal weddings are known for sparing no expense, with some dresses costing up to £6 million. Princess Diana’s wedding dress would have cost over $490,000 in today’s money, while Queen Letizia’s dress is estimated at $8 million. The Manuel Pertegaz-designed gown is described as the most expensive royal wedding dress, with a high-standing collar and long sleeves. The Duchess of Windsor’s dress was priced at £250,000, while Kate Middletons’ Alexander McQueen wedding dress cost an estimated $332,000 in 2011. Rita Hayworth’s wedding to Prince Aly Khan in 1949 was considered one of the best royal wedding gowns of all time. Meghan Markle’s wedding dress is expected to be fit for a princess, but rumors suggest she will wear a custom Ralph Lauren gown. Royal wedding dresses have a long history with interesting designs, with Queen Victoria popularizing the tradition of brides wearing white after choosing a heavy white silk satin dress to marry Albert in 1840. The Duchess of Cambridge’s dress went on display in the Ballroom at Buckingham Palace for three months, with over 600,000 people buying tickets to see it in person.
📹 Ranking The Royal Wedding Dresses From Worst To First
Any time a royal wedding is announced, the world pays attention. There are plenty of people who might not care much about the …
How much did the Queen’s wedding dress cost?
The gown for The Crown was made of ivory silk satin and had 10,000 pearls on it. It was embroidered with flowers. The gown cost £30,000 ($37,000) to make. In the first episode of The Crown on Netflix in 2017, actress Claire Foy as Princess Elizabeth wore a stunning wedding dress when she walked down the aisle at Westminster Abbey. The gown was an exact replica of the one Princess Elizabeth wore when she wed Prince Philip at Westminster Abbey on November 20, 1947. The wedding cake was nine feet tall. Let’s talk about the dress.
A costume designer makes a royal achievement. The gown for The Crown was made of ivory silk satin and had 10,000 seed pearls on it. It was embroidered with flowers. It cost £30,000 ($37,000) to make this in the modern era. This dress took seven weeks to make. The Emmy for Outstanding Period Costume for a series in 2017 went to The Crown costume designer Michele Clapton. That’s a big achievement in royal costume design. The original gown was inspired by a painting. Princess Elizabeth’s original dress was designed by Norman Hartnell, inspired by Sandro Botticelli’s painting Primavera. The Royal Collection Trust says the gown symbolized rebirth and growth in Britain after the war.
Which royal had the most expensive wedding dress?
Queen Letizia: $8 Million Queen Letizia’s wedding dress cost $8 million. A royal wedding is the most important event for royals. These weddings attract millions of people from around the world. They often have expensive decorations and lots of guests. Most of these weddings are now on TV.
Royal weddings have high expectations. The bride’s gown is carefully designed and planned ahead of the wedding. The wedding dress is the most talked-about part of any celebration. How much does it cost to wear a dress that will be remembered forever? The answer is: It’s expensive! We’re looking back at the nine most expensive royal wedding dresses of all time. From Meghan Markle’s dress to Kate Middleton’s and Princess Diana’s dresses, here’s what you need to know.
Who has the most expensive wedding dress?
Here are some of the most expensive wedding dresses and tuxedos ever worn: Angelababy Wedding Dress – $31 million. … The Diamond Wedding Dress – $12 million. … Yumi Katsura’s white gold dress – $8.5 million. … Serena Williams: $3.5 million. … Victoria Swarovski: $1 million. … Kiton: $50,000. … Brioni: $48,000. A wedding is one of the most important days in a person’s life. It’s a day of love, hope, and excitement that marks the start of a new journey with your partner. Brides spend a lot of time and money on their wedding dresses. But you might have wondered why white is the color of a wedding dress. Queen Victoria wore a white silk satin and lace gown when she married Prince Albert in 1840. This established the custom.
How much did Kate Middleton’s wedding gown cost?
Kate Middleton’s wedding dress inspired many copies over a decade later. Hugo Burnand, the official royal photographer, confirms the impact. “I’m editing photos of a bride,” says Burnand, who also shot King Charles III’s 2023 coronation. You can see: Catherine’s dress is there.
Setting the Stage for a Future Queen. Middleton’s first wedding dress may remind you of historic royal gowns. Grace Kelly’s lace dress from Monaco and Queen Elizabeth II’s pearl-embroidered dress by Norman Hartnell are also on display. “The silhouette is similar,” says Holt. “Kate made a conscious decision to dress as a future Queen, even though she was not yet Queen at the time of her wedding.” Like Queen Elizabeth’s ball gown, Middleton’s skirt blooms like a flower thanks to Burtons’ placement of satin gazar arches and pleats.
How much did Meghan Markle’s wedding dress cost?
Taking inspiration from Hollywood and fashion royalty. The dress cost $265,000 and was designed by Meghan Markle’s former Suits star. It took 3,900 hours to design the veil, eight fittings, and five months of secret communication. “It all started out relaxed,” says Waight Keller. “We talked a lot about her personal style.” The actor-turned-producer used classic Old Hollywood gowns as reference points. “She always loved Audrey Hepburn,” Waight Keller says. The 1957 wedding dress designed by Hubert de Givenchy for Funny Face has a similar open neckline, small, rounded, neat shoulder, and sculptural silhouette to Markle’s.
American royalty also inspired her style. “We also loved Carolyn Bessette-Kennedy and her simple wedding dress in 1996,” Waight Keller says. In 2016, Markle praised the late fashion icon’s Narciso Rodriguez for Cerruti bias-cut dress. “Goals.”
How much is Princess Diana’s wedding dress?
Designed by David and Elizabeth Emanuel, the ivory taffeta gown was embroidered with sequins, lace, and pearls, and valued at an estimated $115,000.
She made a grand entrance. Princess Diana had to be stuffed into her carriage on the way to St. Paul’s Cathedral because the fabric was too heavy. Folding the fabric over and over caused wrinkles on Diana’s dress, designer Elizabeth Emanuel told the Daily Mail. Her lace gown was made with a British silk fabric and had a blue bow on the waistband. Diana wore the Spencer family tiara, an 18th-century heirloom. Princess Diana’s gown has a special square of Carrickmacross lace that once belonged to Queen Mary. The square of fabric was either found in a bag of scraps or donated by the Royal School of Needlework. Either way, it linked Diana to royal history.
How much is Diana’s wedding dress?
The $115,000 wedding dress that Princess Diana wore to marry Prince Charles was one of the most anticipated details of the royal wedding. Designed by David and Elizabeth Emanuel, the ivory taffeta gown was embroidered with sequins, lace, and pearls, and valued at an estimated $115,000.
She made a grand entrance. Princess Diana had to be stuffed into her carriage on the way to St. Paul’s Cathedral because the fabric made it difficult for her to fit in the coach. Folding the fabric over and over caused wrinkles on Diana’s dress, designer Elizabeth Emanuel told the Daily Mail. Her lace gown was made with a British silk fabric and had a blue bow on the waistband. Diana wore the Spencer family tiara, an 18th-century heirloom. Princess Diana’s gown has a special square of Carrickmacross lace that once belonged to Queen Mary. The square of fabric was either found in a bag of scraps or donated by the Royal School of Needlework. Either way, it linked Diana to royal history.
How much did Princess Diana’s wedding dress cost?
Designed by David and Elizabeth Emanuel, the ivory taffeta gown was embroidered with sequins, lace, and pearls, and valued at an estimated $115,000.
She made a grand entrance. Princess Diana had to be stuffed into her carriage on the way to St. Paul’s Cathedral because the fabric made it difficult for her to fit. Folding the fabric over and over caused wrinkles on Diana’s dress, designer Elizabeth Emanuel told the Daily Mail. Her lace gown was made with a British silk fabric and had a blue bow on the waistband. Diana wore the Spencer family tiara, an 18th-century heirloom. Princess Diana’s gown has a special square of Carrickmacross lace that once belonged to Queen Mary. The square of fabric was either found in a bag of scraps or donated by the Royal School of Needlework. Either way, it linked Diana to royal history.
Who pays for royal wedding dresses?
In royal weddings, the bride pays for her dress. Meghan paid for her wedding dress. Kate’s parents paid for her wedding dress. Diana’s dad paid for her wedding dress.
Who paid for Kate Middleton’s wedding dress?
The British tabloid News of the World said the dress cost £250,000. Clarence House said that was wrong. It was also said that Middleton’s parents paid for the dress. The ivory satin bodice was padded at the hips and narrowed at the waist. It was inspired by Victorian corsetry, a hallmark of Alexander McQueen. The floral motifs were cut from machine-made lace and appliquéd on silk net by workers from the Royal School of Needlework. The back had 58 buttons of gazar and organza, which fasten with loops. The skirt, underskirt trim, and bridal train (270 cm—110 in) also had lace appliqués. The main body of the dress was made in ivory and white satin gazar. It had a long, full skirt that looked like an opening flower. The skirt had soft pleats that unfolded to the floor. It had a Victorian-style semi-bustle at the back. The dress had a short train that was just under three metres long. To partially fulfill the something blue portion of the British wedding tradition, a blue ribbon was sewn inside the dress. The lace in the 19th-century style was the something old. The British press showed interest in the lace used in the wedding dress, but their reports are at variance with available documentation. Here are the facts about the lace. The bodice design looks like decorated nets from the late 19th century. These include Limerick and Carrickmacross laces from Ireland.23 Machine-made net is used as a base for floral and other designs created by hand-needlework techniques. Embroiderers washed their hands every 30 minutes and changed needles every 3 hours to keep the lace clean until the wedding day. The Royal School of Needlework says that the lace used in Catherine’s wedding dress was inspired by traditional Carrickmacross lace. The technique was different and modern. Floral motifs were cut from lace on large 19th-century machines and stitched to net. Three companies made the lace for the dress. The dress is made with lace from three companies: Sophie Hallette in France, Solstiss in France, and the Cluny Lace Company in England. The machine laces are called English Cluny and Chantilly, but not the older hand-made laces of the same names. The lace wasn’t made for the dress, but was chosen from patterns. The lace used for the bodice is called Kate’s lace, but the skirt and train are made of Solstiss lace. Grace Kelly’s wedding dress was made from lace by Solstiss. All the companies involved are known for their high-quality lace. The floral motifs were from the patterns. The lace designs include roses, thistles, daffodils, and shamrocks, representing the national flowers of England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland.
📹 Royal wedding dresses: a history
What can history teach us about Kate Middleton’s choice of wedding dress? Dr Joanna Marschner reveals the style and …
Both of Princess Ann’s wedding dresses were a statement piece. She wanted to wear the traditional military suit but because she is a woman had to wear a dress. If you look closely at the neckline of the first dress, it has a pearl epaulet design just like those worn on military uniforms. The neckline is just as high as the military uniform collar.
Princess Diana’s wedding dress was beautiful for that era,st Paul’s cathedral was chosen because it could hold more people then Westminster Abbey,so Diana’s dress needed to be lavish and memorable, and when I watched the wedding it was beautiful, I’m glad I got to see the dress twice and now over 40years later we get the chance to see it again at Kensington palace.👸❤️❤️
Each bride wore the kind of dress that was perfect for the era and perfect for the bride herself, so all are beautiful. When I hear about the hours, the meaning of the designs, and the workmanship that went into each dress, I can’t help but appreciate the skill that each designer brought to the dress.
Catherines svelte figure was superbly served by this beautifully designed gown Exquisite handmade Lace Full of symbols as was the dress itself All 4 Parts of the Kingdoms crest marks were in the pattern. She looked superb. Composed feminine Perfect. William wanted to wear the Welsh guard Navy-blue dress uniform . The Queen wanted the red Irish guard one !. He looked better in the Welsh guards Which both he and Harry wore for the sussex wedding.
Diana’s and Sarah’s dresses are very much of their time but nonetheless anyone who has seen them in person will tell you that they are stunning. Princess Anne’s wedding dress is fantastic. It has incredible embroidery on the silk train which doesn’t show up in photos but it is very fitting for a real Princess. My favourites are: 1. The Duchess of Cambridge. 2. Princess Eugenie of York. 3. Princess Anne 4. The Queen (then Princess Elizabeth). 5. Lady Diana Spencer. 6. Sarah Ferguson. 7. Princess Margaret. 8. Queen Victoria. 9. Lady Sarah Armstrong-Jones (Princess Margaret’s daughter). 10. Princess Alexandra of Kent and her sister-in-Katherine Worsley.
No bride will ever top that of The Duchess of Cambridge. She had both opulence of physical beauty, which, in itself, was breathtaking. Her dress, veil & tiara just unbelievably accented the form of her tiny, Barbie doll figure so beautifully! She looked the part of Canada’s future queen. 👑. The countess of Wessex followed in stunning beauty along with Autumn Kelly’s. Three of my favourites in royal family brides! All brides, in their own way and choice of fashion, are beautiful. We really shouldn’t make a comparison of each. They were all married in various times and should be treated as beautiful; al though, The Duchess of Cambridge is still my favourite. Scott Compton, Canada 🇨🇦
I wish you would of shown the wedding gowns of Lady Helen Windsor-Taylor and Lady Sarah Chatto ! Those were absolutely classic beautiful gowns that are timeless ! Lady Gabriella Windsor wedding gown so far was the most beautiful and my favourite ! The most ill-fitted gown was that of Sophie Rhys-Jones (Countess of Wessex). She lost so much weight, and her gown had to be taken-in so many times; therefore her shoulders were ill-fitted, falling off, but over all, it was a beautiful gown. Diana, Princess of Wales stole the show in my opinion ! It was GRAND, big and it served the purpose. It was a good looking gown for that time. It is part of the history now.
Duchess (Princess)Catherine of Cambridge, was just divine as she became the wife of Prince William. They made a completely phenomenal royal couple of this decade. Even if I didn’t see the wedding live on tv was due to my moms terminal illness . We are so blessed to witness the wedding live on you tube even though some were lucky to watch it live on tv and in person.
MM dress is anything but timeless, it looked like it was made from blanket,vs timeless beauty? It just looked ill fitted and unattractive! With mm it’s seems she looks at the price and higher the cost the more class she believes it to have! That has followed her time in the RF and her fashion sense! So many times I had to ask does she not have a mirror, for heavens said someone article her fittings to show her how much off the mark her choices fall..
This wasn’t worst to best this was 1980’s to what fits most by modern standards. Most people in the fashion community regard Diana’s wedding gown as the most significant wedding dress since Victoria popularized wearing the color white. As much as I love her I would rank Meghan’s as one of the worst. The fabric looked too heavy for the silhouette and it could have used another fitting. I found her second dress much more flattering.
My favourite royal wedding dress is of Grace Kelly’s daughter, Princess Caroline of Monaco, when she married Phillipe Junot. It was a very 1970s wedding dress by Marc Bohan for Christian Dior. She shunned a tiara in favor of two buns (very Princess Leia before Princess Leia) covered in dainty floral crowns. loved her look ❤❤
Kate Middleton’s wedding dress and wedding day was so impressive. I think when you think of a princess, she was the perfect image of that princess. Here look was so perfect, the dress, the off-white color, the hair, the train length, the veil length, the neckline, the lace arms, the make-up, the earrings, her gorgeous face, and the tiara! She even got the scale of the tiara correct. It was simple and not too large. A big bonus was her bridesmaid, Pippa. Oh that was so sweet and they look amazing together with the same color dresses….I think that was what kickstarted the trend on bridesmaid wearing white, cream, or champagne trend. Even Pippa’s dress looked amazing. Kate is the picture perfect princess!
I remember the day Kate and Wills got married and I was absolutely floored by that day! I remember physically gasping when she stepped out the Rolls Royce with her Dad. It was the best day of my life! Her dress and Margaret’s dress are my all time favorite. Margaret’s hair and crown were absolutely stunning and she looked gorgeous!! Eugenie should have been included on this list because she looked like a Renaissance queen. Also, I don’t know why, but I have always loved the way Princess Anne’s dress looked. I hate how they keep calling it bizarre in this article because it was a “Tudor style gown” with a very snatched waist that flattered her perfectly. I wish the girls on Say Yes to the Dress would choose dresses like these. And Diana’s dress, I say no more. She looked like a Lady of the Manor.
Even though Diana’s dress wasn’t “at par” with the 2019 standards of fashion, her face and the timeless glow in her skin and her personality made up for it. She was beautiful, she is beautiful and she will always be absolutely BEAUTIFUL. The best the royals have seen in years. Nobody can be compared to her and her beauty.
One reason why I think that Kate’s is the best is that, to me, it meets the need for the dress to be fit for a future queen consort. The designer who is known to be bold and over the top (which I personally love), but the real genius of the designer was actually the ability to design a wedding dress that is bold, but it is also timeless.
Remember the New Romantic fashion era in London in the late 70s/early 80s? Boys wore make-up, and we all dressed like pirates and regency bucks, with neck frills, lace, bloused full sleeves. Think Adam Ant, Spandau Ballet, Ultravox… It never spread far beyond the UK, but was quote memorable for the music and fashion. Diana’s dress totally reflected that New Romantic style and is certainly the strongest fashion statement. It wasn’t “classic” but, as a reflection of the fashion of the day it would rank tops. What you’re really ranking in this vid is the most classic timeless style – “best to worst” is misleading.
Princess Eugenie married yesterday (12.10.18) and looked stunning in her beautifully simple wedding dress. She had a low back which she apparently chose especially to leave her spinal surgery scar exposed. I thought that was such a great statement for her to make in an age where, sadly, flawless physical perfection has become an absolute obsession and more important than any other attributes to a woman. I like to think it was also a big middle finger to the media for the way her Mum has been ripped apart over the years about her constantly fluctuating weight and how the tabloids loved nothing better than comparing her to Diana.
I was disappointed in MMs dress. It was boring and if she hadn’t had the veil, it would have been even worse, although I questioned why someone who had been married, once or twice, wore a veil at all. It is my least favorite. Catherine’s was my favorite, followed by Camilla’s, Margaret’s, Sophie, Sarah, Elizabeth’s, Dianna’s, Anne’s, and finally MM. One Royal bride’s dress not listed is Eugenie’s. It was breathtaking, and without the veil it was even more beautiful, allowing the beautiful back to show..
I feel like a wedding dress should hold up over time. There are a lot of classic lines that allow a dress to do that. I honestly can’t imagine anyone 50 years down the road thinking Kate’s dress was horrible, but when I see Diana’s, or those high turtle neck gowns, I feel that they are so dated or just can’t be fashionable ever again. I think when we look back on wedding fashions, the gowns most people love even to this day, are ones that women in particular see themselves saying, I could still wear that even ten, twenty years from now.
Diana’s dress was a typical over the top Emmanuel. Such a slim attractive girl ended up looking like a meringue. Even in the 80’s it was hideous & I saw it first hand at a Royal Wedding dress display at Kensington Palace. It was creased when she got out of the coach & stayed that way for the whole of the wedding. Having seen all of these dresses, with the exception of the latest two, in the flesh they were all better than Diana’s. HRH The Duchess of Cambridge wore a dress fit for a future Queen & HRH The Duchess of Sussexs’ was sheer class.
Personally I remember being disappointed with Diana’s dress at the time.When she got out of the coach it was a mass of creased up material not very elegant and I didn’t like the sleeves but as I e said that was and still is my personal taste I think Kate’s, Meghan’s,Sophie’s and now Eugeenes dresses were all far more elegant and becoming for a princess each with her own touch.
I think Camilla looked lovely on her wedding day. Most probably because I’m soooo tired of that boring boring white. And I really wish Meghan, as a 2nd time round bride, had done a COMPLETE non-traditional thing, and worn something a little different. A bit of (pale) colour, and/or more of an ‘evening’ dress – not so bride-like. Completely ditch the OTT veil, and set a new trend. Much like Queen Victoria did. Dare to be different. I thought the best thing about Meghan’s wedding garb was the tiara! Simply gorgeous!!
I know they are public figures, but they are people too. Imagine one of the happiest days of your life, filled with love, in a dress YOU felt exited about. Then imagine someone making a article, comparing your wedding look to other women close to you, that you care about. A article actually ranking ‘which was the worst look’. How do you think you would feel?
I always feel like so many people are unfair to Princess Diana’s gown. It is fair to say it did not age well. But at the time, it was the height of fashion. The wrinkles were unfortunate but it was still the dream gown for a lot of eighties brides. You don’t have to want to wear a similar one to acknowledge what it was in its time.
As much as I loved Diana, that dress was atrocious. The excessive fabric could have dressed several people. The veil must have put a strain on her neck. She was by far the most beautiful person, but that dress did nothing for her. It swolled her whole. Her style was more sleek & lovely. I understand the designer’s desire to present innocence but where was the young adult in that monstrosity? Kate Middleton definitely got my vote as 1st choice. I rather liked Princess Anne’s mock turtlenecks, very modest. I regret the overly exposed bosoms of today’s fashions, MODERATION brides. Leave something to the imagination.
This documentary was not clear, concise or presented well. Instead of showing a side angel of Dr. Marschner nervously speaking a picture of the dress should be shown with the princess wearing it. Then, it would be helpful to see a full length picture of the dress, front and back, followed by detail photos. If Dr. Marschner is indeed passionate about these dresses she should show the dresses with only her voice narrating. I have no idea what the producer of this documentary was thinking?
This article is for people who don’t mind doing their own research, or who have already done previous research into the historical clothing of the Royal family. It barely scratches the surface of the depth of historical Royal clothing. Honestly each piece could easily have its own hour long segment. But this short article inspires me to search for more and I rather enjoy that. There is always so much more to learn out there!
Muslin (/ˈmʌzlɪn/), is a cotton fabric of plain weave. It is made in a wide range of weights from delicate sheers to coarse sheeting.It gets its name from the city of Mosul, Iraq, where it was first manufactured. Early muslin was handwoven of uncommonly delicate handspun yarn, especially in the region of what today is Bangladesh. It was imported into Europe for much of the 17th and early 18th centuries. In 2013, the traditional art of weaving Jamdani muslin in Bangladesh was included in the list of Masterpieces of the Oral and Intangible Heritage of Humanity by UNESCO.
Indeed! Where is she as I am rolling asunder trying to get to sleep at night and know that a lovely, soothing voice, like this historian has, would sooth me to sleep? Dr. Marschner has a calming, alto voice which, if listened to while trying to get to sleep (and b4 a valium) would be of such great help.She could talk about anything from the needlework put into these gowns, which interests me, not, to the evolution of musical theatre, which interests me immensely, and I’d be asleep at 2 sheep.
The earliest wedding dress here belongs to Charlotte princess of Wales🥰 it appears to be shimmering silver, but was also seen with gold thread, born to a king and queen who apparently only consummated there wedding night and hence had a beautiful daughter, princess Charlotte who married the prince of her choice, sadly she died in childbirth and her son stillborn…..changing the course of the royal family that stands today 🥰
Where is all the Honiton lace that was on Victoria’s dress? There was a huge flounce on the skirt that was later taken off for her daughters’ dresses. Also, I always heard that she commissioned the lace to boost the flagging British lace industry and only later had the idea of including it on her wedding dress . . . .Maybe that’s an urban myth.
You have to give her a bit of a break. It’s very rare that any person can talk about any subject for any length of time without saying “umm”. Yes, she does say it a lot, but if you look at her body language. you can tell that she’s VERY nervous. Her body is angled away from the camera, her head is angled to the point where she has to look sideways at the camera, she continuously plays with the ring on her hand…she is super uncomfortable & still manages to be incredibly informative. Poor gal!
Everyone who can’t see the little gems that this amazing historian is dropping is obviously lacking in any analytical skills. Lots of details here just Google all the things she says. Literally a stack of books would fall on your tiny little heads. I commend her ability to composite so much in such a short article. Bravo
They are completely wrong about Elizabeth II’s dress is not like the one they showed when talking about it and they are completely off on the topic because of it. Her dress was extravagant. It was satin with extensive embroidery and the mood of the wedding wasn’t meant to show reserve, but to be celebratory after winning the war. The war ended 1945 and Elizabeth was married in 1947.
Some years ago all of the major royal wedding gowns were put on display at Kensington Palace. It was an absolutely stunning event. You could get very close to each gown and really see the detail. This is what Historic Royal Palaces do so well. Alas, all you can see today at Kensington Palace is the dreadful “Enchanted” exhibtion – which looks for all the world like a low grade 6th Form art school project.
IMHO, “Queen Victoria” was the original “Royal G.O.A.T.!!” ❤️ As an American…..I admired AND adored, the late “Queen Elizabeth II”!! I cried when she “departed this Earth”….🥺 Indeed, the ENTIRE WORLD “lost” an EXEMPLARY WOMAN on that heart-wrenching day!! Catherine, Florida Peace, Prayers and Love!!✌🏻🙏🏻❤️
pls help: Watch the episode on history of royal wedding dresses.\r \r Mark the sentences which are true according to the episode: – All wedding dresses bear a statement.\r – Queen Victoria was advised to wear her coronation ceremonial dress for her wedding.\r – Princess Elizabeth’s dress carried a promise of changes and a better future.\r – Media attention brought on significant changes to royal wedding dresses style.\r – Royal wedding dresses has always represented power and importance of the political union.\r – While choosing fabrics for the dress, the level of manufacture’s recognition was one of key factors.\r – Royal dresses have always been designed by famous dressmakers.
Princess Margaret’s dress & Grace Kelly’s are my favourite famous dresses, perfect bridal dresses. Hated Diana’s, looked like it was websiteing an old lady’s flannel nightgown. Kate’s was tailored to perfection, but hated the low wobbly neck line and it was predictable & boring. I wanted to see her in something streamline, with a big skirt over the back and two sides. If tailored better to her, Meghan M’s was elegant & tasteful and unexpected, but not appropriate for a divorced woman.
Look at the dresses so gorgeous Queen Elizabeth scale when you’re able to see it up close is spectacular. There is a couple of royal wedding dresses in recent history where I was underwhelmed. To have all that money and such a plain and straight down oh, I just don’t get it.Megan’s dress look like you could walk into any formal dress shop and pick it up off the shelf. I truly admired eugenie’s dress. I would have also liked to seen princess Diana in a different dress. That dress totally overwhelmed her. You could see a neck and a head surrounded by tons and tons of material. Megan’s dress was just so plain and unattractive. But I fell in love with her veil. I wouldn’t have thought of the bail that long but if I were to get married again that’s definitely something I would want.
IMHO, the two worst royal wedding gowns were those of Lady Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon and Lady Diana Spencer. Both were very unflattering. Elizabeth’s made her look frumpy, did not suit her round face and petite build. Diana’s gown swallowed her completely. Oh those sleeves! Hideous. Both women went with the fad styles of their day, never a wise choice for a high ranking royal bride. Those pictures will live for centuries. Elegant, traditional styles are a much better choice.
Royal weddings are STILL political. Today, though, instead of being international alliances to enhance treaties or to create allies, they are used to gull the people into thinking that they so-called “royals” are no different than you or I and you, too, commoner can aspire to marry a “royal” (provided you can pony up the dowry (right Grace Kelly, Diana Spencer, and Kate Middleton?). What nonsense.
She created a disaster because then every bride wanted to sew her own dress instead of sending it out…or hiring it out….so we had women going crazy and consuming endless hours trying to sew their own dresses….short of going insane before the wedding because she too is responsible for the wedding planning or must hire the family to do that or the groom is now responsible and his family for the wedding planning which I think is rather what was done up until now and the Baby Boomer Generation. So even so….marriage was popularized….and many married many times throughout their lifetime….however….fabric became inexpensive and in high demand…not bad for an insane trandition or elocution…quite profitable…but what you have not said nor mentioned are the 2 to 3 dresses also required for after the wedding and boarding the coach or losing the trane to board the coach and then the reception dress and the dance dress and the Escape and leave to your honeymoon dress in the limo or coach etc…that’s 1 wedding dress or 2 and then 2 reception dresses and a father and mother dance dress and 1 honey moon dress…total 6 dresses including the wedding dress….insane yet….hahaha…or rather having fun and all planned out and meticulously organized. So we have long term organization and planning and short term…and insitu and sur place.
What a dreadful documentary, this was all about the presenter, & hardly anything to do with the dresses on display. It needed the dresses to be shown and taken centre stage, with presenters voice over, in the background. Instead it was the presenter, who took centre stage, with the dresses “somewhere” in the background. Ha ha ha
I’m very disappointed. I was hoping to see photos of royal brides wearing their wedding gowns. All we got was mannequins wearing wedding gowns. Near the end of the article all we see are magazines with out-of-focus glimpses of a couple royal brides. She talked a great deal about Queen Victoria’s wedding gown but sadly, no photos of hers either. Victoria was famous for introducing the white wedding gown which is very important to brides even today.
As an instructor of Public Speaking for Professionals, Levels I, II, and III, I would have given Dr. Joanna Marschner a failing grade on her narration. Her informative speech was full of ummm’s, uhhhhh’s and unnecessary filler words which unfortunately, made her appear more like the surprised participant in a “Man on the Street” segment of the local evening news, rather than the professional academic she is. In addition, she portrayed a variety of tics, movements, and nervous mannerisms e.g. ring twisting, body swaying, over use of hand gestures, causing the viewing and listening audience to be distracted. That concludes the lesson for today! =P
OMG Could that woman, so full of knowledge, with access to the most iconic dresses; Wedding Dresses that inspired Brides for over a Century, be any more Boring? She may be well spoken but I found her ‘affect’ to be very flat and hard to hear actually. Not only that but she seemed to be stumbling over her words, the nervous “um’s” and hand-wringing were really distracting too. They talked about but didn’t show ER’s dress, she failed to mention Princess Anne at all, and while she skated over Di’s dress, a dress that was copied all over the WORLD, Kate’s dress? not there. They had THE most fabulous material, the most fantastic history, the actual dresses and the Senior Curator and they produce (barely) this TOSH!! Shame on you.