How Were Marriages Arranged In Medieval European Society?

In the central Middle Ages, marriage making was a complex process that involved courting, betrothal, and the choice of a partner. The Western Catholic Church’s influence on marriage and the fall of Rome, the rise of Islam, and the signing of the Magna Carta contributed to the changing perception of medieval marriage. Marriages were carefully considered transactions, with romantic love being less important than securing a sound economic base for a secure relationship where children could be raised.

Arranged marriages were common throughout history, with many people getting married first and falling in love with the person they fell in love with. These marriages were based on kinship bonds and a rearrangement of property, with personal liking or love not being a requirement. In medieval England, marriages were often arranged by the bride and groom’s parents, with girls typically in their teens when they married and boys in their early twenties.

In the early modern era, discussions limited to dowry provisions and grants made conditional on dowry were often part of a more complicated social reality. The arrangement of marriage was done by the bride and groom’s parents, and most marriages were arranged between the families of the bride and groom.

In medieval Europe, getting married was easy for Christians living in western Europe, as the church created and enforced arranged marriages involving exchange of property. As society evolved, the place of mutual consent in the marriage order was elevated, but it was not always the primary focus.


📹 Inhuman Practices of the Dark Ages: Wedding Night Horrors

In the hallowed halls of our collective past, shrouded by the veils of time, echoes a tale of an era steeped in tradition and rigid …


How did people marry in medieval times?

Sex made them married. A medieval couple could create a marriage in many ways. A couple could marry by saying “I do.” No special words or formula were needed. A present consent marriage didn’t have to be consummated. If the couple agreed to get married and then had sex, this was seen as a physical expression of present consent. So, having sex made a marriage legally binding. Consent could also be shown by giving and receiving a gift. A “wed” could be any gift that meant consent to marry, but often a ring. A wedding where a man gives a woman a ring and she accepts it creates the marriage. Married or not married? People misunderstood. It was hard to know if a couple was married. They might not even know themselves. The English church warned men not to give rings of reeds or other materials to women in jest so they could fornicate with them. Most marriage cases in court were about proving that a marriage had taken place.

How were marriages arranged in medieval european society class
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

What age did girls get married in medieval times?

You could get married at puberty, without your parents’ permission. In the Middle Ages, marriage was the only acceptable place for sex. Christians could marry from puberty on, usually at 12 for women and 14 for men. No parental consent was needed. When this law changed in England in the 18th century, the old rules still applied in Scotland. This made towns just over the border, like Gretna Green, a destination for English couples defying their families.

The wedding of Saints Joachim and Anne, the parents of Mary, the mother of God. Codex of Predis. (Photo by Prisma/UIG/Getty Images)

The medieval church said that couples should get married with their free consent. But in practice, families and social networks usually had a lot of influence over who couples married. People at all levels of society made arrangements for their widows and children. Everyone was expected to ask their lord for permission. Kings even consulted over their own and their children’s marriages. People of different classes were not allowed to marry.

Did medieval Europe have arranged marriages?

Men could choose their brides. People didn’t marry for love. Most marriages were political. Wives and husbands didn’t know each other before they met. If love was involved, it came after marriage. Even if they didn’t love each other, the couple usually became friends. The bride and groom’s parents arranged the marriage. In the Middle Ages, girls were usually teenagers when they married, and boys were in their early 20s. Money was the basis for marriage. The girl’s family gave the boy a gift. The dowry was given to the groom at the wedding. After the marriage was arranged, a notice was posted on the church door. The notice was put up to make sure the marriage could go ahead. The notice said who was getting married and that anyone with a reason why they couldn’t marry should speak up. If the reason was valid, the wedding would be stopped.

How did medieval weddings work?

A medieval wedding mass. The priest opened the church doors and led the bride and groom, their attendants, and the best man to the altar. Everyone else sat down. The bride and groom knelt at the altar. Their attendants held a canopy over them while the priest said mass. After mass, the attendants took off the canopy. The priest then kissed the groom. The groom kissed his bride. The priest then blessed the wedding. As the bride and groom left the church, the choir sang “Angus Dei.” Diehl, Daniel, and Mark Donnelly. Medieval Celebrations: How to Plan Holidays, Weddings, and Feasts. Mechanicsburg, PA Stackpole Books, 2001.

Who arranged most marriages in medieval Europe?

People got married for political, land, or financial reasons. Parents arranged marriages, and people married young. Christians only married after puberty. From 12 for women and 14 for young men.

Medieval marriage laws
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

What were the rules for medieval marriage?

Medieval betrothal law. In medieval England, the law said how people could get engaged and married. The law said that the bride and groom had to be old enough to marry. Girls had to be 12 and boys had to be 14. A young lady could marry of her own accord. The law said no one could force a woman to marry. However, this law could be overruled by the family in some cases. Both families offered a dowry. Plus, the groom promised to support his bride if he died before her. Families used marriage to improve their status, which was allowed by law. But in arranged marriages, the families didn’t let the bride talk. She could refuse the arrangement if she wanted. Once both families agreed, the bride and groom were engaged. Then, the families told everyone about the marriage.

Publishing the banns. After an official betrothal, the bans were published. The bans were posted in a public place for a set period. As the church was important in medieval times, the bans were usually on the church door. In some places, the banns were announced three times in a row at the start of a church service. This gave people who might have a claim to the bride or an objection to the wedding time to say so. Once this period passed, the families threw a big feast for the bride and groom. At the end of the feast, they were married. ~Angela Magnotti Andrews.

How were marriages arranged in medieval Europe?

People from land-owning families didn’t usually marry for love. Most such marriages were arranged by their parents or guardians. Arranged marriages are still common in many societies today. They are based on the same ideas that motivated medieval English people: to create stable families based on respect and duty, where love can grow; and to protect and increase the family’s wealth and status by association with another family of equal or higher repute. Peasant women who didn’t own land had to pay a fee to marry.

Did medieval peasants marry?

Sex and Spouses Marriage, Pleasure, and Sex. In the Middle Ages, the church offered women two ways to avoid sin: become a nun or have children. Most women had to marry and have children. Hostensius said that girls were ready for marriage once they were physically ready for sex, and the same was true for boys. However, girls could marry at a younger age than boys because they reached puberty earlier. Girls were usually ready at age twelve, and boys at age fourteen. Many couples didn’t marry for love or sexual attraction because of arranged marriages involving property. Many marriages were unhappy. This is reflected in a popular saying of the time: No man ever marries without regretting it. People in the lower classes only married for love or sex. Peasant marriages were not common because the poor did not need to exchange property. Marriage was also seen as a way to control sexual activity and desire. All sex outside of marriage was sinful. Most canonists and theologians thought sex within marriage was only acceptable for procreation. Most authors agreed that a good sexual relationship was good for marriage. However, it was also popular opinion that desire and pleasure should not be the main focus. For example, Thomas Aquinas said that a man who slept with his wife only for pleasure was treating her like a prostitute (Brundage, 448). Similarly, St. In the 4th century, Jerome said that a man who loves his wife too much is an adulterer. This idea lasted until the 16th century. William of Pagula was more lenient. He said it was not sinful to marry for sexual attraction, as long as this was not the main reason. Procreation was seen as the only acceptable reason for marriage. The church made it clear that sex within marriage was for procreation. There were many rules about how it should be done. James Brundage says that sex in marriage should be planned and thought about carefully to avoid sin. The Summae Confessorum, a handbook for confessors published during the early thirteenth century, said that sexual activity between husband and wife was not allowed on certain days, including feast and fast days, Sundays, and when the woman was considered unclean. Most married couples could have sex less than once a week. In II.10 of the Decameron, Messer Ricciardo di Chinzica, who can’t keep up with his younger, lustier wife, finds a way to limit their sex life.

Medieval marriage traditions
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

Did people marry their siblings in medieval times?

He looked for a husband for his daughter, sister, or any girl in his family. Sixteen siblings could marry if they were born of different mothers. Many examples of such marriages are known. Uncles and nieces could marry each other, and so could adoptive siblings.

Get help. Institutional access. You can access content on Oxford Academic through an institutional subscription or purchase. If you’re at an institution with an active account, you can access content in one of these ways:

IP-based access. Access is usually provided across an institutional network to a range of IP addresses. Your account is automatically signed in. You can’t sign out. Sign in through your institution. Choose this to get remote access when outside your institution. Shibboleth/Open Athens lets you sign in to your institution’s website and Oxford Academic with one account.

Why were marriage contracts arranged in the middle ages
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

Did medieval peasants marry for love?

Many couples married for money or because they were attracted to each other. Many marriages were unhappy. This is reflected in a popular saying of the time: No man ever marries without regretting it.

Sex and Spouses: Marriage, Pleasure, and Sex. The church told women they could avoid sinning like Eve by becoming a nun or by having children. Most women were expected to marry and have children. Hostensius said that girls were ready for marriage once they were physically ready for sex, and the same was true for boys. However, girls could marry at a younger age than boys because they reached puberty earlier. Girls were usually ready at age twelve, and boys at age fourteen. Many couples didn’t marry for love or sexual attraction because of arranged marriages involving property. Many marriages were unhappy. This is reflected in a popular saying of the time: No man ever marries without regretting it. People in the lower classes only married for love or sex. Peasant marriages were not common because the poor did not need to exchange property. Marriage was also seen as a way to control sexual activity and desire. All sex outside of marriage was sinful. Most canonists and theologians believed sex within marriage was only acceptable for procreation. Most authors agreed that a good sexual relationship was good for marriage. They also agreed that desire and pleasure shouldn’t be the main things in these relationships. For example, Thomas Aquinas said that a man who slept with his wife only for pleasure was treating her like a prostitute (Brundage, 448). St. Jerome said in the 4th century that a man who loves his wife too much is an adulterer. This was a common belief until the 16th century. William of Pagula thought it was OK to marry for love, as long as it wasn’t the main reason. Procreation was seen as the only acceptable reason for marriage. The church made it clear that sex within marriage was for procreation. There were many rules about how it should be done. James Brundage says that sex in marriage should be planned and thought about carefully to avoid sin. The Summae Confessorum, a handbook for confessors published during the early thirteenth century, said that sexual activity between husband and wife was not allowed on certain days, including feast and fast days, Sundays, and when the woman was considered unclean. Most married couples could have sex less than once a week. In II.10 of the Decameron, Messer Ricciardo di Chinzica, who can’t keep up with his younger, lustier wife, finds a way to limit their sex life.


📹 The Royal Weddings That Shaped European History

Over the course of her almost 64-year reign, Queen Victoria strategically planned marriages to place her descendants in royal …


How Were Marriages Arranged In Medieval European Society
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

Christina Kohler

As an enthusiastic wedding planner, my goal is to furnish couples with indelible recollections of their momentous occasion. After more than ten years of experience in the field, I ensure that each wedding I coordinate is unique and characterized by my meticulous attention to detail, creativity, and a personal touch. I delight in materializing aspirations, guaranteeing that every occasion is as singular and enchanted as the love narrative it commemorates. Together, we can transform your wedding day into an unforgettable occasion that you will always remember fondly.

About me

19 comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • One of the problems I have with these topics is they are always presented almost exclusively from the perspective of Nobles and Royalty. Many of the issues presented mainly affected them, and not Serfs. Serfs were not arranging marriages to consolidate power. Serfs were not perusal couples consummate a marriage. Serfs were not marrying their immediate children in incestuous unions (unless in very remote hamlets with limited populations). A great many serfs married people they loved. I would even argue far more often than any Noble ever did. It just paints this picture for viewers that all of Medieval Europe was this way for everyone, and it wasn’t in the slightest. It’s like saying the woes of rich people today, the top 1%, are the same as the lower 99%…it would be inaccurate at best. While thankfully this one doesn’t do this (entirely), it is a very common issue.

  • Great job!!! Great voice/narration, great research, editing, and presentation. I haven’t got to the end yet but don’t be afraid to ask people to subscribe (if you don’t), comment/like, it is a shitty thing to have to do (you feel like a beggar), but makes a bigger difference than you might think. And you, my friend are sure to have exponential growth in your subscribers! Very seriously. The best of luck to you!

  • I really have to wonder… Not much seems to have changed since the middle ages. Perhaps in certain communities more than in others, still, I see so many remnants, be it perceptions of the respective roles of spouses, the ceremonies and rituals, display of wealth and social status at weddings and much more…

  • Liked and subscribed. THIS is how it’s done!! Provide good, interesting content and DON’T add to every article “Smash that like button” or “Please like and subscribe”, etc. That shit is SO OLD and I doubt there’s a single person alive who watches YouTube articles that doesn’t know already how to hit the “Like” button or subscribe. THANK YOU for the excellent content… I’ve been perusal the WWII articles so far and have found it to be an incredibly refreshing experience not hearing the schilling for likes or, “Let me know in the comments below” crap. I’ll DEFINITELY support your website!!

  • 13:17 In areas like Scandinavia, couples married well into their twenties … depends. Overall, Medieval matrilinear lines, which obviously span several countries of nobles and royalty, tend to have median at 16 or 17 for girls, lower quartile anywhere between 13 and 15, higher quartile 18 or 20 … some of the higher ages I have seen are in fact for Swedish royalty (I think the first wife of near king Birger Jarl, a son and brother in law of two kings of Erician dynasty, and father of the new dynasty, was 20 or 22, but his second wife had married at age 15 in Denmark).

  • I also just found this website and while I am well versed in some areas of history, others I am not. I don’t know how old this website is but the imagery (even if not accurate at times) and narration is superb. However, some of the “facts” are confusing or contradictory. Or both. I very much enjoyed the 2 or 3 articles I’ve seen so far and I look forward to diving into this rabbit hole but I hope you get better/clearer on your research and presentation of the information you present. It can only get better if you do. Having said that the biggest conundrum I’m having at the moment is choosing which article to watch next.

  • Dowries and bride prices could be seen as monetary transactions, and have tons of negative consequences, but as said they were also hoped to ensure a better life for the bride, groom or even the parents. I think it was sort of like parents now paying a child’s way through college, or helping them buy a first house – it gives the kids a better start and if 20 years later in the parents retirement, if they have some kind of crisis, they can go stay in a room in their adult kids kids house, which is easier if things are going well for the kids.

  • While Philip may have agreed to give Eleanor a divorce because they had had only daughters, she very much wanted to leave the marriage. In fact, she appealed for a divorce during the Crusade they went on, and only stayed at the persuasion of the Pope. She remarried 2 months after the divorce, to Philip’s horror (to Henry, of course).

  • Lol marriage to this day in the eyes of the law is a tax/money thing and by religion a contract of ownership..still…what marriage by the state or church has to do with love…puzzles me…like god wouldnt know wether you love unless your married…its just nutty dark ager stuff we still do for no reason…except to own.

  • When women were judged to be inferior and mere possessions, they could be used as bribes, for political or financial reasons. Widows may have fared bettere on re- marriage. Until women gained more respect and freedom there was no way they could marry for love. Some were lucky and grew to love or like their spouses, a few very strong women with influence became powerful But not intil the mass loss of life in the great war, were women finally allowed to claim similarrights to men. And not until the late 20th century have we got even close to equality.

  • While I do think that your article is excellently made and presented, as a social historian I find it continually irritating that, lacking the abundance of written records for the common people as opposed to the upper class, it is assumed that everyone in society followed the same practices. You do point out that the lower classes followed practices of selective mates for marriage, but it was for a different purpose among the “working class” or lower classes. And what we do know of the common people during the 1,000 years that you generally cover, the practices of the upper class were not actually mirrored among the peasantry. This is to say, when most historical topics are covered for anything prior to the latter 18th century, the historian presenter speaks of what the upper class was doing but presents it as though it was throughout the social stratum. Not unlike so many cookbooks of the 20th century presenting culinary dishes that are alleged to represent a particular culture, but should you go to stay with someone of the everyday middle or lower class in that culture, you quickly discover that they eat food prepared very differently and often not with the ingredients that chef back in NYC insists upon to be “culturally representative”. As my cousin in La Rochelle had said, “We French don’t actually make most of the dishes you Julia Child put in her ‘French’ cookbook”.

  • Unpleasant whiny subjective look at medieval customs, as quite typically judged by nowadays’ woke academia. Romantic love as a reason for marriage has been an outlier basically only for the last 100 years. And looking at the divorce rates since about the 1950ies, not a very successful concept as well.

  • I really don’t think that this was inhuman at all. The Church still insists on mutual consent. They still also believe that husbands must love their wives as Christ loves the Church, offering Himself up for it. There are still obligations that are solemn and binding… the punishment for refusing to perform those obligations or cheating on their spouse is eternal punishment in the fires of Hell. Marriage vows are solemn and binding for the life of one’s spouse.

  • Men didn’t marry who they wanted,they were forced just like women were.Also,we have to understand that a 12yo girl mindset back then was very very different from nowadays.Most high rank young women were married to noble young men,who at least were fit and manly,not some disgusting slobs.I hate this anachronistic approach.

  • American women are outraged by arranged marriages. But given the statistics today … lots of empty casual sex, inability to find marriage material men, high depression, lots of frozen eggs…. I bet 90% of them would love if their family arranged potential husbands for them to screen that are educated, looking for a wife, make good money, and are at least a 6.

  • Even today in some islamic nations, a bloody sheet is vital. If she does not bleed, a chicken was kept nearby to avoid embarrassing the groom and his family. The bride being quietly sent back to her family in disgrace. In America, Jerry Lee Lewis married his 13 yr old cousin, then divorced her because she was too good to be a virgin. My grandparents were an arrange marriage and was, I suspect, my mother’s first marriage. She lied about her divorce and pretended to be a widow so she could marry my father. considering the divorce rate for marriages founded in live, I believe that arraigned marriages may be a better option.

  • Queen victoria didn’t arrange the marriages of her children or grandchildren. She wasn’t even allowed to do that. She wanted her children to marry other nobles/royals but that’s it she didn’t care who, she didn’t care if they were a future king or the third son of a Duke. In fact, she didn’t want her granddaughter Alexandra to marry Nicholas because the Romanov Family didn’t get along with Victoria’s daughter in law: Princess Alexandra of Denmark. 2 daughters of Queen Victoria didn’t marry royals, but rather nobles who didn’t have much wealth or power.

  • Get familiar to all of the guests there… There are more royal figures there… Bulgarian tsar Simeon II is there as well, and he is a cousin to the queen, more precisely, his kids are third cousins with the queen. Do your research better next time in order not to make yourself look ridiculous and with 0 knowledge of the topic you’re covering…

  • Everyone who thinks or feels God doesn’t care, is indifferent and or mean etc …… Why is the world as it is, evil everywhere… where is God and His faithfulness….. God does judge sin which is evil and if people don’t stop sinning they will die for that disobedience,that sin. When God said if you take from that tree you will die He was saying if you disobey, you sin, I will punish that sin because God does punish it, sickness, demons and death. And if you keep sinning I will punish you to the point of death, is that punishment. Sickness is a consequence of sin and it is a judgement God makes upon the people for their sin. All sickness takes its toll on the body and will result in death unless you stop sinning and that brings a reward from God for the righteous decision to stop sinning that brought that illness. Throughout scripture God tells us these things. God does love and there is mercy in His punishment too. He chastises those He loves. His wrath doesn’t mean He doesn’t love, it doesn’t mean there is no mercy, it means He puts His law first and He obeys it first. He punished sin and then punishes sin and so forth and if someone doesn’t stop sinning or sins more then that judgment is death just as He said, sin is death. Scripture says we are all responsible for working out our salvation with fear and trembling. Seek scripture, learn who He is and what He said to obey and do it. if you obey Him you live in blessings just like Deuteronomy 28 says and it also says disobedience is curses, that’s sickness, demons possibly and again to continue in sin results in death.