Deuteronomy 7:2-5 teaches the Israelites not to marry anyone who did not follow the true God. God does not prohibit marriage between a Christian of one race and a Christian of a different race.
Deuteronomy 24:1–4 discusses the Mosaic Law related to divorce in ancient Israel. In order for a divorce to be granted, there had to be a problem related to the widow’s widow’s husband’s brother. A newly married man must not be sent to war or be pressed into any duty. For one year, he must stay at home and bring joy to the wife he has married.
Deuteronomy 17:14-17 establishes several principles related to divorce and remarriage. God’s ideal was a marriage that united two people as one “as long as they both should live.” Today, God’s desire is for marriages to be permanent and sources of joy and fulfillment to both parties.
Marrying a captive woman is forbidden, and if a man finds a beautiful woman among the captives, he may take her as his wife. The result of the marriage will be a hated wife and a firstborn son of her.
In Deuteronomy 22:28-29, a man must pay fifty shekels a of silver to marry a virgin who is not pledged to be married and rape her. He cannot divorce her as long as he lives.
Deuteronomy 22:22 warns against lying with another man’s wife, stating that they will both die. Marriage should be honored and kept undefiled, as God will judge sexually immoral and adulterers. Leviticus 20:10 states that a man who has recently married cannot be sent to war or have any other duty, and for one year, he can stay at home and bring happiness to his wife. A man must never marry his father’s wife, as it would disgrace his father. Divorce and remarriage are important, as they reveal the desire to bring happiness to each other. The first couple can remarry if both individuals remained unmarried since the divorce. Deuteronomy assumes that children will naturally ask questions about spiritual matters in their parents’ lives.
📹 Deuteronomy Principle 26: Marriage and Divorce
Www.bibleprinciples.org When determining God’s will regarding marriage relationships, we are to follow the teachings in the New …
Can a man divorce his wife in the Old Testament?
Deuteronomy 24:1-4 says: 1. If a man marries a woman and then decides he doesn’t like her, he can write her a divorce and send her away. 2. If she leaves, she can’t come back.
What is the biblical message about marriage?
The Bible says husbands should love their wives and teach young women to love their husbands. Love in marriage is deeper and more selfless than in any other relationship. Jesus wants us to love like this. It’s the most important thing for couples. Marriage is more than just a legal contract. Marriage is part of God’s plan. The Bible teaches what God wants in marriage and gives advice on relationships.
Marriage is forever. It is meant to be a loving, intimate relationship between a man and a woman that lasts forever. The Bible says, “Husbands, love your wives” (Ephesians 5:25) and “Teach young women to love their husbands” (Titus 2:4). Love in marriage is deeper and more selfless than in any other relationship. Jesus wants us to love like this, and it’s the most important thing in a relationship.
What is the best verse in the Bible about marriage?
4 He replied, “Have you read that at the beginning the Creator made them male and female? He said, “˜For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh. God joins together what God joins together. This verse shows the importance of unity in marriage. Let them stay together and be one. WARNING: Being one does not mean unhealthy boundaries or codependency. To keep unity, you must grow and experience life on your own. Check out 10 non-cliché Bible verses for your wedding HERE. We can’t wait to see how you use these verses on your special day!
P.S. Are you a Forever Bride? We send weekly wedding inspiration, planning advice, and special deals to your inbox! Plus, it’s free! Sign up here.
What does Deuteronomy 24:5 mean?
Moses said that newly married men were exempt from war for a year to establish their homes and make their wives happy. The law in v. 5 was to complement a previous law in which a man engaged to a woman was exempt from military duty (Deuteronomy 20:7). Moses talked about when a man takes a new wife (v. 5). This man shall not go out with the army like the engaged man. Going out with the army means the man might die. If he died in battle, he wouldn’t have any children. The newly married man was not allowed to go into combat so he could build a strong home and have children. He was also exempt from all duties. Such duties would take away his time at home. The idea was to make sure new households were strong and healthy. If the couple spent time together, this would help. The man was free at home for a year. He was to make his wife happy. He wasn’t to have any public obligations so he could spend time with his family. This would have two important benefits. It would give the couple time to love each other. Second, it would let the couple have children. This would stop the couple from being childless if the husband died.
What does Deuteronomy 24:1–4 mean?
The wife had been defiled. The term “defiled” also means “unclean.” It was used of adultery in Leviticus 18:20 and Numbers 5:13-20. The idea seems to be that remarrying the first husband might be considered adultery, which is an abomination before the LORD. The LORD said that sin would come to the land if they tolerated this behavior. If they sinned, they would lose their peace and prosperity in the Promised Land. When Israel broke the rules, they would suffer. This suffering would be the result of cause and effect in the world. When the strong take advantage of the weak, society falls apart. This law deals with a woman who has been married, divorced, married again, or widowed. This law says that if a woman is divorced and then remarries, her first husband cannot take her back. Jewish tradition said this rule stopped “wife swapping.” If a man could divorce and take back his wife, he could do it often, turning her into a property to exploit. The law was meant to promote God’s covenant of love and care for others by discouraging exploitative practices.
What is Deuteronomy 31 vs 27?
Deuteronomy 31:27 KJV: I know you are rebellious and stubborn. While I am still alive, you have rebelled against the LORD. How much more will you rebel after I die?
What does Deuteronomy say about marriage and divorce?
Deuteronomy 24:1-2 King James Version (KJV) If a man marries a woman and then decides he doesn’t like her, he can write her a divorce paper and give it to her.
What does Deuteronomy 2843 say?
Deuteronomy 28:43-45 NIV: The foreigners will rise above you, but you will sink. They will lend to you, but you will not lend to them. They will be in charge, but you will be at the bottom. The foreigner will rise, while you sink. He’ll lend to you; you won’t lend to him. He’ll be in charge; you’ll be at the bottom. All these bad things are going to happen to you. They’ll hunt you down and get you because you didn’t listen to God and keep his commandments. The curses will serve as warnings to your children. The stranger within you will rise high, and you will fall low. He will lend to you, but you will not lend to him. He will be the head, and you will be the tail. All these curses will come upon you until you are destroyed. You did not listen to the LORD your God. The stranger will rise above you, but you will go down. He will lend to you, but you will not lend to him. He will be the head, and you will be the tail. All these curses will come on you until you are destroyed because you did not obey the LORD your God.
What is the Bible verse Deuteronomy 28-43?
The foreigners will rise, but you will sink. 44 They will lend to you, but you will not lend to them. They will be in charge, but you will be at the bottom. 45All these curses will come on you.
The Holy Bible, New International Version®, NIV® Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984, 2011 by Biblica®.
The Holy Bible, New Living Translation, Copyright © 1996, 2004, 2007. Used with permission of Tyndale House Publishers, Inc. Carol Stream, IL 60188.
The Holy Bible, English Standard Version® Copyright© 2001 by Crossway Bibles.
Can a woman divorce her husband in the Old Testament?
If a man divorces his wife because he finds something indecent about her, and she then marries another man, her first husband cannot marry her again. That would be bad in God’s eyes. Don’t sin against the Lord your God. – Deuteronomy 24:1-4.
Jewish law during Jesus’ time allowed divorce for many reasons. Examples include not liking how a wife dresses, her age, or her ability to have children. The teachers of the law focused on whether a certificate had been filled out properly, not the reasons for the divorce. I bet they were also concerned with whether all the fees/favors were paid in advance. The Deuteronomy passage shows that the law is there to protect marriage, not make divorce and remarriage easy. The Deuteronomy passage shows that divorce is wrong. It hurts divorced women and families.
What are the three biblical reason for marriage?
There are three reasons for marriage. God made marriage for three main reasons: companionship, having kids, and redemption. These purposes are still important today. Let’s look at each one. Companionship. Marriage is for companionship. In Genesis 2:18, God said it wasn’t good for man to be alone. God made marriage so that man and woman could be close. This relationship is based on love, trust, and communication. It shows us how we should relate to the Lord.
📹 Jesus’ Method of Interpreting Israel’s Laws • Deuteronomy Ep. 6
Jesus used the laws in Deuteronomy as a starting point in teaching God’s ideal way of life for humanity, but he didn’t stop there.
Why am I seeing ads on this article? We are a nonprofit, crowdfunded organization and don’t make any money from advertising. Because of music licensing restrictions, we are unable to control ads on this article. 100% of our articles, podcasts, and educational resources are available for free. You can listen to our entire podcast library, check out our other resources, and give at bibleproject.com.
I can’t with handle this conviction hardly anymore😢. I recently thought the Lord was reunited me and my ex. I had the signs and so did she. But she cited free will and friend zoned me. I’ve even had dreams of it happening; and not making this up, I’ve lived through them. I am now so confused. Now all I can do is pray for mercy. Just praying for her salvation and hopefully to be done as Hosea and Gomer. This has been a long three years of dreams and moments too coincidental to be coincidental. Too long of a story to type. But until then, I have to press on. May God keep her in perfect peace. In light of the days ahead. Amen
I know why we are declared impure. I have been married 4 times and love all my husbands but most were evil saying they were Godly men. I was not ready till I was 48 to see the evil and abuse I had been in since youth. I think we as abused women put up with sometimes unlimited abuse because that’s what have been used to. I would see that as God saving us from evil.
It goes beyond even this is what I think. But you are very correct in your understanding. We are finite beings traveling on a road called Infinity. As you said early on about so little in the Written Word of God on the subject and then all the if clauses and the very narrow explanation of how to behave tells you right there – Our Creator is not taken with our attempts at following rules. We were given the rules long ago. Those, having broken all of them, and those being the most important – and after all that, more rules are needed? Our failures were done by us. But our Saviour, The Saviour, Saviour is here to help. So-called scholars have long since turned spiritual writings into a reason for imposing rules upon others – they do this without looking at Scripture as One Work. It’s clear today as it was clear to Jesus, I’ts One Work. Your Creator, our Creator, The Creator waits for humans to get knowledge from a Relationship, The Relationship is there to clear up any question. The Written Word of The Creator must be taken as an Entire Work – I very much liked the way you did that. God Bless all.
A friend told me that there is a verse Jeremiah 17 verse 13 where it says “Lord, you are the hope of Israel; all who forsake you will be put to shame. Those who turn away from you will be written in the dust because they have forsaken the Lord, the spring of living water.” They think that Jesus was referring to this when he bends down and writes in the dust @ 55:00
Yeshua (Jesus) didn’t do away with the law, HE raised the bar. Moses said love your neighbor, Jesus said and also your enemies, Moses said an eye for an eye, Jesus said turn the other cheek, Moses said give her a certificate of divorce Jesus said it was not so from the beginning, whoever divorces wife or husband and marries another commits adultery, Luke 16:18 Mark 10:10, the exception clause is not adultry in the original texts, it is pornea.
At the almost stoning of the woman caught in adultery the reason the elders were the first to leave the sene was 1). Jesus called out their sin first. this was because it was the elders who had the legal right to condemn her to death, and the mob would not move to stone her without their approval. 2). They themselves were condemned and so it put them in a really bad situation to be embarrassed but also to lose their position, power & their own life if the sin was bad enough.
Breaking of a covenant seems to be the big deal. Adultery breaks the marriage covenant, so the one divorced for adultery broke the covenant first. I’ve heard some say that abusing the spouse also breaks the covenant and allowing for divorce for that reason. A man not supporting and taking care of his wife and children could be seen as breaking the covenant.
A carnal understanding of the law means we are still under the law. A man is a person being made in the image of God. That is why the apostles call everyone “brothers” in the beginning. Its not until later (after suffering for a while) that those who love God find a wife (a great mystery) for therefore a man will leave his father and mother to be joined to his wife and the two shall become one flesh. I have uploaded the new testament gospel of Joseph for a few who are seeking for God’s will and true comfort
You made a statement about Adam and Eve being told by God that if they ate from the Tree of Good and Evil that on that day they would surely die, but he showed his mercy and did not kill them but banished them from Eden; However, if they would have never eaten of the fruit and obeyed god’s command wouldn’t they/us still be alive in the garden? One must remember that the Bible states in 2 Peter 3:8 states: ‘But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day.’ So, the word of God as always was/is true, they surely did die that day.
Jehovah the one who loved the world and sent Jesus,(John 3:16) enthroned his King and firstborn son Jesus, Paul quote this same words preaching and Peter and John while praying calling Jesus the holy spiritual son and servant anointed by the Father. Acts 13:33 Paul said: God has completely fulfilled it to us, their children, by resurrecting Jesus; just as it is written in the SECOND PSALM: ‘You are my son; today I have become your father.’ Psalm 2: 2 The kings of the earth take their stand And high officials gather together as one Against Jehovah.. and against HIS ANOINTED ONE (Jesus). 3 They say: “Let us tear off their shackles And throw off their ropes!” 4 The One enthroned in the heavens will laugh; Jehovah will scoff at them. 5 At that time he will speak to them in his anger And terrify them in his burning anger, 6 Saying: “I MYSELF have INSTALLED MY KING On Zion, my holy mountain.” 7 Let me proclaim the decree of Jehovah; He said to me: “You are my son; Today I have become your father. Acts 4: On hearing this, they raised their voices with one accord to God and said: “Sovereign Lord, you are the One who made the heaven and the earth and the sea and all the things in them 26 The kings of the earth took their stand and the rulers gathered together as one against Jehovah and against HIS ANOINTED ONE (Jesus).’ 27 For truly both Herod and Pontius Pilate with men of the nations and with peoples of Israel were gathered together in this city against YOUR HOLY SERVANT JESUS, whom YOU ANOINTED,
I highly recomend to anyone who trully wants to see what Jesus was doing on the Sermon on the Mount as the fulfillment to Deuteronomy 18:15 Jesus was the Fulfillment of Exposition of Laws true meaning And because Israel did not want to Listen to God on Mount of Sinai God Has held the conversation for the later date when He spoke To Israel Through His Prophet Son King Messiah Branch Rock High Priest and much more.. And When Jesus Has Finished His journey he has Enacted A new Covenant between God and God where Now Everyone who Believes the Gospel Is Part of the Family of God through His life given To Them Freely And there is no more Sin Death Law For those who are new creation And that new creation is not governed by Laws principles of daily living.. We are lead by the Spirit of Truth who has testified to those who Believe That we are Children of God.. No longer flesh and blood But New Heavenly creation which is perfect sanctified prrfected glorified by the Presence of His presence in Us… Praise Jesus
One interesting thing about the woman caught in adultery is also about the law that requires two witnesses against the condemned person. The teachers of the law and the Pharisees who, on the surface, care so much about the law, are by the end of the story gone from the scene. It is now just Jesus and the woman caught in adultery. Jesus has dismissed all the witnesses! So following that law requiring two witnesses, Jesus does not condemn her. But as was said in the podcast, Jesus lets her go but with the command not to sin any more. I find Jesus’s use of the law (maybe what Jon Collins would also call sleight of hand) fits with what Tim said about Jesus and his use of the law.
JESUS IS OUR ONLY REDEEMER THANK GOD HE FULFILLING ALL THE LAWS AND HE SAID IT IS FINISHED☺️☺️ALL WAS REHEARSAL FOR WHAT WILL HAPPEN SOON THE SPIRIT AND THE BRIDE WILL MEET AGAIN. AS JESUS SAID WHEN HE COMES WILL HE FIND FAITH? MAY OUR FAITH NEVER FAILS BY ENDURANCE AND PASS THE GREAT TEST OF FAITH. THE BRIDEGROOM IS COMING. 😊😊🙏
51 minutes in : taking a woman as a wife is NOT always an act of thievery or oppression — even in times of war. Men and women need one another and filling the space of desolation with honor is not necessarily a bad thing. He would be cloaking her with his provision and protection, which she would ultimately still have need for even in the wake of her previous husband.
It is not oppressive, rather Godly that a man should not take back a woman who has been gone into by another man. Yahweh’s determination on such an act is true and pure. If that does not make sense to you, you likely aren’t understanding biblical marriage/patriarchy appropriate. No man within the kingdom should want to lay with a woman who has been intimate with another man after the divorce. I think this is common truth. Yahweh co-signs.
There are some pretty disgusting comments on here and needless semantic discussions about “fornication” vs “adultery” forgetting that Yeshua said that if you look upon a woman with lust you have committed adultery in your heart. We don’t need to define what sexual immorality or adultery is (and some comments to define this in the commenter’s opinion are gross!). We just need the Holy Spirit and the Word.
God raised up Israel as His own people. He did this after everyone had gone after other elohim, the fallen members of Gods heavenly counsel. If you read The Unseen Realm you will understand that His people had to be different and were held up to the Heavenly standard. Therefore taking prisoners or capitol punishment for failure make sense for what He was accomplishing. You are correct that Jesus has a longer view in mind when He answers Pharisees questions.
Genesis defines Terms for Us 1. Alive- breath of Gods life is in Adam making Him Unique Being- Nishmat Khayiim 2. Death- absence of Gods presence with Adam Genesis 5:3 Adam bore sons in His image image of Death. Humanity- Adam No longer reflected of Him self the presence of Shakhina Glory of Gods presence.. the Glory has departed… lifted off… God was fixing these two Issues through Jesus On the Cross The Sin issue And Death Issue How to Restore Life into a life less spiritless being…. So that they would never Die Again….. The Death of True Life possessor Jesus Has fulfilled the Requirement of the Law- Life for Life….. No one outside of Jesus Had any life to Give…. All were dead in Adam… spiritually dead, and infected by Sin Which Held Humanity under captivity to Sin because sin was Feeding Power given power From The Law of God!!! And Killing keeping everyone dead……,., Corinthians 15:55 Everyone Died had No Life So Jesus Came to Solve that Problem To Give Life in abundance…,,, To do that Sin had to be delt with first… and it was on the cross for avery human being for ages to come… So now anyone who believes the Good news is Made alive- by the indwelling Holly spirit- His breath that Jesus breathed on to desciples saying Recieve the Breath of Life John 20 When he had said these things, he breathed upon them and he said to them, “Receive The Spirit of Holiness.” Joel 2:28 Isaiah 44:3 Mark 1:8 As It was prophesized I baptized you with water; but He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit.
I disagree about the man who divorces a woman after finding the nakedness of a thing and then she marries another and he hates her and the first man wants to marry her again and I think that our aggressively, overly feminist society compels people to be pressured in to thinking it is sexist but it is not because when you go that direction you are off course and missing the point like having eyes thought seeing not that to me the real point is that the first husband might have time to start to miss his ex wife and forget the bad things that made him divorce her and only dwell on and nice things that he misses about her and that if he is being a decent, loving man, he might consider remarrying her but God is providing a way to reassure that man and to make him slow down and think realistically instead of thinking with his nakedness and his desire for intimate nakedness that could cloud his judgement like if he was wrong about her then the second husband would never have divorced her but if the second husband has also divorced her then this should indicate that the divorce was the fault of the woman after all compared to say if a man divorced his wife and she remained alone and she still had love for her husband and she did not remarry and then maybe the husband could realize and want to remarry her and see that maybe she is capable after all because the text does say the first husband discovered the nakedness of a thing in her, it is not saying that he divorced her for no reason and is just flexing his sexist power over her it is telling us he discovered a legitimate reason to divorce her he found the naked exposure of a detestable thing about her like if she hid a thing that is worthy of divorce and he divorces her, but later misses her naked thing and misses the good things about her but she has been remarried and divorced again then this is a sign she is defiled and is not suitable for marriage because some people are just not suitable for marriage and this is just to help a man from making the same mistake again just because he, over time, forgot the valid reasons for divorcing her, this is how I feel about it because I experienced the feeling of missing an ex and the process in my mid of, over time finding myself wanting to trick myself in to wanting her back but reminding myself, she is out there being defiled by other men and letting her back would be a mistake and then remembering the real, valid reasons that she had to be kicked out in the first place and there is nothing sexist or societal about that it is timeless practicality and the ways of the Lord can be trusted
The first commandment is the same, Jesus obey the first commandment but Christians now a days don’t obey it or understand it well: Matthew 22:37\r Jesus said to him: “‘You must love Jehovah your God with your whole heart and with your whole soul and with your whole mind.’ Deuteronomy 6:5\r You must love Jehovah your God with all your heart and all your soul and all your strength. John 14:31 Jesus said:\r But for the world to know that I love the Father, I am doing just as the Father has commanded me to do. Get up, let us go from here. John 8: 54 Jesus answered to the Jews: “If I glorify myself, my glory is nothing. It is my Father who glorifies me, the one who you say is your God (Jehovah)
“Everyone who divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery, and everyone who marries a woman divorced from her husband commits adultery.” Luke 16:18. That’s the word straight from our Lord. Don’t try to change it. If you divorce your wife, you cannot marry another ever. A woman cannot marry a divorced man. The covenant with God has been broken. No adulterers will be accepted into the eternal kingdom.
I’ve looked over and over but found no use of the word ‘marriage’ in Genesis. In the same way I find no use of ‘husband’ or ‘wife’, just man and woman. I do find allusions to the conditions for forming a relationship by said man and woman – the only humans in the Garden at this time, a poignant and notable point. Yet hardly a surprise given that what is being described is ‘in the beginning ‘. I have to question the elevation of the putative interpretation of the text in support of a religious heteronormative excludatory gender-based precept. I’m somewhat surprised Tim Mackie hasn’t looked beneath the surface on this matter.
God intends and establishes a Oneness in marriage that is not to be broken by man. “God hates divorce.” However, in this corrupt world, Jesus said that Moses allows divorce “because of hardness of heart”. Unsaid in Scripture is the damage that befalls the children. A New Heart is the only solution that pleases God.
Also,”hardness of heart” most likely without the certificate of divorce, the woman would other wise be cast out into excile,where she would likely suffer greatly,such as starve because she would not be able to adequately make a living. Or worse so,she could be stoned to death. And I personally get the expression that the ancancient ancients Israelites where all about stoning. I don’t know,I am still very young in CHRIST, but just saying.
This assessment of Christ is completely wrong, as it implies that He used His own reasoning to “interpret” the Law like the religious leaders. As the God who revealed those laws to Moses in the first place, Christ didn’t “interpret” the Law. He taught the Law in the way that it was originally meant to be understood.
Jesus says: Mathew 5:32 …and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery. Matthew 19:9 …and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery. Luke 16:18 … and whosoever marrieth her that is put away from her husband committeth adultery.” Paul says the same: 1 Corinthians 7:39 39 A wife is bound to her husband as long as he lives. But if her husband dies, she is free to be married to whom she wishes, only in the Lord.
Here is the translation of the verses as Aaron has descibed it out of the copy of the Mathew he has at home! “Husband was bereaved of the leaving of his wife. He will give her things to take to include a Divorce. I tell you if a husband is bereaved over his wife leaving amongsts the things given is also a divorce that if he says she left to commit adultery he is the adulterer! And if he takes her back he will commit adultery! Story of a woman leaving Her husband for any reason! Husband is very upset and he accuses her that she is guilty of adultery! Accusation with no evidence meaning it might be a false accusation! False accusation is dangerous, according to the law of moses if your found falsly acusing your punished with same penelty! Death!
Regarding the woman caught in the act of adultery: there is a more grounded interpretation with what David Pawson says. Jesus merely dismissed the case because there was no charge made… Had the charge been made, according to David’s view: she would have been stoned to death according to the law. According to modern understanding and preaching, it’s made out to be as though Jesus would never condone capital punishment, which is not true. Think about the thief on the cross… he had forgiveness, but he underwent the just punishment of the law.
It’s silly to say that she’s a passive victim. Assuming the man makes a good judgment, then she actually did something terrible. She initiated the divorce by doing the thing, and the man would be the passive victim. In real life, there’s rarely a passive victim and both parties do things that cause the divorce, but it is possible for one party to be solely to blame. If one party is solely to blame, then the other party would be the passive victim, could be the man or the woman. Your discomfort with the passage does not come from having a new testament mindset. It comes from a modern sentiment that women do no wrong.
You are being too easy on the Bible by saying it didn’t mean to create a gender differential. Genesis clearly states in Genesis 2:22: Then the rib which the Lord God had taken from man He made into a woman, and He brought her to the man. In Genesis 2:20 it states that he did the above because “there was not found a helper comparable to him.” In Genesis 3:12 Adam describes Eve as “the woman you gave to be with me.” In Genesis 3:16, God says to Eve, “Your desire shall be for your husband, And he shall rule over you.” So, as we can see, God did create a gender differential. One thing Christians miss because they don’t want to see it, I think is that God made woman “desire her husband.” This means sexual desire as well as other kinds of desire – protection, company, admiration etc.. Throughout the Old Testament, men are given credit for “begetting children.” God does not say the woman begat the children even though she is the one that lay on her back, was impregnated, grew large with child, bore the child in pain and then suckled the child at her breast. It’s always men who get credit for almost everything in the Bible. In Genesis 5:1,2 The Bible does say, “He made them in the likeness of God. He created them male and female, and blessed them and called them Mankind in the day they were created. So, here we see God being just as kind to women as men in that he made both of them in the likeness of God, blessed both of them, and called both of them Mankind. In Genesis 5:3 it goes on to say, “And Adam lived one hundred and thirty years, and begot a “son” in his own likeness, and named him Seth.
Dear fellas. Thanks for your efforts but what stopped me from listening further was when Tim, you said OMG which is not right at the 48.01 minutes time frame. You have many subscribers. The platform is a stumbling block to others by doing this. Please refrain from this wording which we know is not right. OMG is belittled sin by many in society. Wishing you the Wisdom from above. Thank you.
I’m a bit baffled as to why the prophets we’re completely left out of this discussion. Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and Isaiah all give very important context on how to correctly frame the deeper meaning of the discourse between Jesus and the Pharisees. The discussion here is so surface level and profane, it really makes me question what these guys are doing. Jeremiah chapter 3 and Ezekiel chapter 23 put the whole discussion of what Jesus and the Pharisees were debating into a completely different frame. There are so many questions that snap into sharp focus and actually make sense when one comes to understand that everything surrounding Jesus’ death and resurrection are directly related to the law regarding divorce and remarriage. That is why I am a bit disturbed that these guys didn’t give Jeremiah more than a passing mention. Jeremiah specifically refers to God giving Israel a letter of divorce for goodness sake. How much more relevant could you get to this topic? And yet it is utterly neglected here. One has to understand the history of Israel immediately following Solomon’s death and the ongoing dispute between Israel and Judah afterward. What did Jesus mean when He said that He came only for the LOST sheep of the tribe of Israel? Why did Jesus accuse the Pharisees of being Jews who are not Jews, bit of the Synagogue of Satan? Why did Jesus wait to come to Lazarus until three days after he was placed in the tomb? Once one begins to understand the law and the history of Israel following the great schism, then the words and actions of Jesus take on new significance.
If the reason/ground for divorce is adultery then it contradicts the law where the punishment of adultery is death penalty of the adulteress and the adulterer. Is the word pornea in ancient time ( in greek language) mean adultery? You won’t be able to divorce a woman who commits adultery because adultery is a sin punishable by death. Why give a certificate of divorce if the woman is going to die anyway?
I don’t see the death or surely die that God speaks of is the type of death that man has come to believe, which is of the body. How can we man have capital punishment (a term not in Scripture) when a top command from God is not to kill a man because God made man? Cain was not slain, but protected from such fate. Yet, he was cast out of earth and from the fruits thereof. This command is amplified or detailed after Noah and family left the Ark. Then again with Moses from God’s own finger. And with Jesus, if you hate a man, you have committed murder. So, God isn’t speaking about death to the body, which is His temple. God clearly says He gives life and takes away life. Life is of God. No man can take it away. I see the death God speaks of for a man in disobedience to Him is separation from God, which is like unto those of the seed of Satan. It’s a type of prison we enter in sin, which wages is death. This speaks to the spirit, not the carnal. Your thoughts.
Why is the wife who marries another after being disserted and divorced by her first husband then considered impure and detestable? What if it’s the unfaithful husband who discards and divorces his first wife, marries another, but then returns and remarries his first wife? Does God allow that or would he also be considered impure and detestable?
How about if a wife who is clean and pure and take a man for a husband take her vows and believe them marriage he says yes to vows don’t mean them and cheat before during and after marriage their whole marriage and brings drugs into the marriage cheat and bring uncleanness on her for 35 years.He leave her for another and live with her.Dont just mention women.Thank you.
45 minutes. I think you have it incorrect that he rapes her. Looking as your Deuteronomy 21:14, reference and compare it to many others, including 2 Samuel 13:14 we have different Hebrew words. “ana’ is not rape, but “ana” combined with “saqah” is rape. He actually did humble her by doing the many things to her before she by trickery or truth drcides to marry him instead of being a slave. It seemed better to her to marry him than be a slave. But she did not join herself to Israel like Ruth and chise to remain her previos culture at heart thus he put her away the a “gat”, divorce papers.
Don’t just stop at Matthew 5:17 continue reading the next verse to get the full context…. “Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. For verily I say unto you, ➡️Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.”⬅️ Matthew 5:17-18 KJV Has heaven and earth passed away? No, it hasn’t. Therefore the Law(Torah) is NOT done away. The only part of the Law that is not done is the animal sacrifices, because Yeshua(Jesus) replaced the animal sacrifices. See Hebrews 7:27, Ephesians 5:1-2, 1Peter 2:4-5
The part that talks about the wife and her second husband and the reason she can’t go back to her first because she had become impure is this: During intimacy between husband and wife it is the woman body that absorbs her husband not the man, because of this if her first husband has her back her body is impure because her body is still carrying her husband fluids. It was Bishop TD Jakes or another minister like him that I learnt this from. And the part that you said shortly after this you said divorce has ‘developed’ – it has not developed but been modified or changed
If YAH / God Granbted me One Wish, I would wish Tim Mackie could see passed his own bias,’ taoght to him by Manned Religion, He is a beutiful teacher with Excellent knowlage of the Paleo and Aramaic Scripts… Unfortunately His bias views From a Relion making him stiff Necked, makes his Heart of Stone, closes his eyes and ears to the TRUE knowlage that We are supposed to be REBORN into the Family of YAHisrael. Laws of stone will return in Revelation, but until then we are suppose to Love the Fathers Will. It is a Heart Matter know. For this Is the good news, we have a path, be it narrow,, we srill have path. ~PROFS / WITNESS~ Jer 31 31-33 for more on who we are suppose to be! Duet 30 10 if you obey the LORD your God and keep his commands and decrees that are written in this Book of the Torah/Law and turn to the LORD your God with all your HEART and with all your soul. Proverbs 3 3 Let know loving commitment ant TRUTH forsake you-bind them around your neck, write them on the tablet of your HEART. Ezekiel 11 19-20 And I will give them one HEART, and a new spirit I will put within them. I will remove the HEART of stone from their flesh and give them a HEART of flesh, that they may walk in “my statutes” and keep my rules and obey them. And they shall be my people, and I will be their God. Hebrews 10 16 This is the covenant I will make with them after that time, says the Lord. I will put my TORAH/ law in their HEARTS, and I will write them on their minds.” Jer 31 33 But this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the Lord: I will put my TORAH within them, and I will write it on their HEARTS.
You are implying (in one of several occasions) that the Loving God of all and, that is true and just would allow a man to “take” a woman just because his heart was hardened ? I’d be careful with the spreading of assumptions ! Sounds an awful lot like the spirit of the Anti-Christ. Better be 100% sure before you can presume to stand in the temple of God while speaking as God.
I don’t think you guys have any practical knowledge in marriage and divorce. While this podcast/recording of audio is somewhat interesting and in a way entertaining, it is not taking this topic as seriously and realistically. So much time and emphasis spent on “dignity of women and children” while ignoring the reality of this real world – have you ever had to deal with marriages gone wrong and spoken to actual re-married/re-constructed families? The topics handled here are immensely heavier and perhaps beyond your scope of expertise. Please focus your attention and talent into what you’ve been called for – the visual presentation of the scripture. I liked the way you explained the concepts through visual presentations many times over. Verbal pseudo-debates of these types are, in many ways, flawed.
The Bible’s stories are for spiritual purposes. We know from Paul’s NT writings that there is a hierarchy in which man is the head of his household, as Christ is the head of the Church. So, we can see that woman represents a faithful or prostituted wife…So to say that a wife is impure after divorced, remarried and not available to the first husband is symbolic, even as it is psychological for both parties. And it is consistent and demonstrable of God’s message. After all the Bible and this existence is about a greater truth and reality, the biggest picture of all; from a benevolent Creator who is giving us everything…I’m not sure if you two are being sympathetic to the audience, or if you are a little soft about the topic. But even as the Church is soft on the full teaching of Paul about women’s role in total, we don’t lean on our own understanding but we follow the words of our Savior (as given thru Paul; even as Paul was building on his knowledge of the OT)