The Story of an Hour by Kate Chopin is a short story that portrays a negative view of marriage in the late 1800s. The story revolves around the unhappy relationship between Brently and Louise Mallard, who suffer from heart trouble. The author’s perspective on marriage is cynical, as it denies women the right to practice their independence or have a voice.
The story highlights the inequality that governs relationships between men and women, affecting women’s choices and options regarding marriage. The author uses the tale of Lenz’s marriage ending to illustrate the story of Lenz’s marriage, which was not abusive or harmful. However, the story views marriage as an unhappy one, where women had no say in their marriage and were not associated with love.
The story is a perfect example of why a spouse should not be chosen for you. The views of marriage in the story are outdated and based on the marital roles from the 1900s when women had very limited rights. The story is filled with raw emotion, award-winning actors, and an authentic story of the complex journey of divorce.
In conclusion, The Story of an Hour by Kate Chopin presents a negative view of marriage, focusing on the unhappy relationship between Brently and Louise Mallard. The story serves as a reminder that marriage is not about freedom and independence but rather about the control and control of men and women.
📹 How Romanticism Ruined Love
The set of ideas we can call Romanticism is responsible for making our relationships extremely difficult. We shouldn’t give up on …
📹 Theme of Love and Marriage in Pride and Prejudice
Explore the central theme of love and marriage in Jane Austen’s beloved novel Pride and Prejudice. This video delves into the …
Romanticism or basically the Romantic era of English Literature evolved as a rebellion to the class system in Europe, where poetries were earlier written only in the praise of upper class people, and was circulated only in high-society. The sharing of poetry and fiction was limited to the affluent, and it was seen as a luxury. Only Kings and Lords, had the authority for enjoying poetry. The Romantic era brought a change and the poets began writing poems about nature, and daily life of common people. It was an era when the printing press made book publishing a big thing, so suddenly writing became a profitable business, compared to earlier times when writing was done only for plays. The epic romance ideas that has now somehow ruined the ideology of common people is was nothing but a reflection of what the masses wanted. Wishful thinking, one must say. Writers catered to public fantasies, about ever lasting love between man and a woman who found each other in difficult circumstances, a hope for a better life, fantasies for men about finding an extremely beautiful and naive woman, or fantasies for women about finding an extremely rich and handsome man…. These wish fulfilment fantasies would later be colored with monogamy, loyalty, and attachment, because who wouldn’t want their good-looking partner to be solely theirs? Such things added pressure on men and women, and they began looking for partners who fulfilled their standards…. Today, as I look back, I see how easy it was making money out of gullible people.
In the era of passion, where emotions ran free,\r Romanticism arose, a poetic decree.\r But in its fervor, did love find demise?\r A tale unfolds, where romanticism lies.\r \r With quills and ink, poets crafted desire,\r Love, an ethereal flame, in the romantic fire.\r Yet, did idealization breed love’s decay,\r As romanticism painted love in hues of gray?\r \r In the moonlit sonnets and starry gazes,\r Romanticism soared, through emotional mazes.\r But did it set expectations too high,\r Leaving reality to wither and sigh?\r \r Love, a tumultuous dance in the romantic breeze,\r Yet, did romanticism plant illusory seeds?\r A utopian vision, where flaws are concealed,\r Did it mask love’s truths, and emotions unsealed?\r \r In the wild landscapes where hearts entwine,\r Romanticism flourished, a passionate sign.\r But did it foster a notion too ideal,\r Leaving love’s authenticity to conceal?\r \r In the ruins of romance, where illusions crumble,\r Love’s reality may not always humble.\r For in the grand tapestry where emotions wove,\r Did romanticism, in its zeal, taint the trove?\r \r So let us reflect on love’s true embrace,\r Beyond the romantic ideals, in reality’s space.\r For love is imperfect, yet beautifully real,\r A genuine emotion that time can’t steal.