Will There Be A Bride Of Frankenstein Remake?

The Bride of Frankenstein remake is in development, directed by Maggie Gyllenhaal for Warner Bros. and starring Christian Bale and Penélope Cruz. The movie is expected to release on October 3, 2025, and will be released in theaters and IMAX on October 3, 2025. The production start date suggests a late 2024 or early 2025 release. The movie could have an appropriate release date.

The Bride of Frankenstein is the latest attempt to resurrect the classic monsters, with several exciting updates about the remake. The original Bride of Frankenstein was set to be the next film in Universal’s Dark Universe cinematic universe, but there hasn’t been a release date. However, the Bride of Frankenstein remake is expected to have an appropriate release date.

The Bride of Frankenstein remake features an impressive cast, including Christian Bale, Peter Sarsgaard, Jessie Buckley, Penélope Cruz, and the latest addition, Annette Bening. While specific roles remain under wraps, the casting choices hint at a dynamic reinterpretation of the classic characters.

The Bride of Frankenstein is set to premiere on October 3, 2025, and will also play in Imax theaters. The movie is expected to be a hit with fans of classic monsters, as it has been rumored that Maggie Gyllenhaal will direct the remake.

Did the bride of Frankenstein love the monster?

Young Frankenstein. In this 1974 parody film, Dr. Frederick Frankenstein is engaged to Elizabeth, but falls in love with the lab assistant Inga instead. Concurrently, Elizabeth discovers that she loves the Monster. In the final scene, Elizabeth is married to the Monster, who has been made into a stock market genius by having Frederick donate a portion of his own brain. Elizabeth has taken on a personality like the 1935 Bride in order to please her husband. Madeline Kahn does a humorous imitation of Elsa Lanchesters hissing, spitting performance.

Frankenweenie. In Tim Burtons short film, the monster dog Sparky, after surviving the collapse of the burning windmill, meets a female poodle who has a headdress similar to Elsa Lanchesters Bride.

The Bride. In this obscure film, Baron Charles Frankenstein creates Eva (Jennifer Beals) as a bride for his monster.

Is there going to be a new Frankenstein movie in 2024?

In 2023, the project was revived by Netflix, who del Toro had signed a multi-year deal with to produce projects. Following the win of Guillermo del Toros Pinocchio at the 95th Academy Awards for Best Animated Feature, Variety revealed that he was set to write and direct the feature with Andrew Garfield, Oscar Isaac and Mia Goth in early talks for potential roles.15 In September, del Toro revealed that filming was scheduled to commence in February 2024, and that Christoph Waltz had been added to the cast.16 In January, Jacob Elordi replaced Garfield for the role of the monster, due to scheduling conflicts that had resulted from the SAG-AFTRA strikes.1718 Felix Kammerer, Lars Mikkelsen, David Bradley, Christian Convery, and Charles Dance joined the cast in undisclosed roles.1819 In April 2024, del Toro announced Ralph Ineson had been cast in the film in a pivotal cameo appearance.20.

Filmingedit. Principal photography began on February 12, 2024 in Toronto, and is expected to wrap in July.19.

• ^ Mike Sampson (October 26, 2007). Guillermo talks!. JoBlo.com. Archived from the original on February 3, 2014. Retrieved October 27, 2007.
• ^ Adler, Shawn (January 1, 2008). Guillermo Del Toro Ready To Unleash Frankensteins Monster. MTV Movies Blog. Archived from the original on September 18, 2015. Retrieved March 3, 2024.
• ^ Chris Hewitt (February 8, 2008). Guillermo Del Toro Talks The Hobbit. Empire. Archived from the original on November 23, 2011. Retrieved February 8, 2008.
• ^ Fleming, Michael (September 3, 2008). Guillermo Del Toro booked thru 2017. Variety. Archived from the original on October 10, 2023. Retrieved October 8, 2023.
• ^ Max Evry (October 5, 2008). Guillermo del Toro on The Hobbit and Frankenstein. ComingSoon.net. Archived from the original on October 5, 2008. Retrieved October 5, 2008.
• ^ Guillermo del Toros Frankenstein is Not The Traditional Creation Story – Film. October 6, 2008. Archived from the original on June 24, 2021. Retrieved February 3, 2024.
• ^ Josh Horowitz (October 14, 2008). Guillermo Del Toro Talks Hobbit Casting, Creatures. MTV. Archived from the original on October 17, 2008. Retrieved October 15, 2008.
• ^ Guillermo Del Toro Casts Doug Jones in Frankenstein. June 14, 2009. Archived from the original on June 16, 2009. Retrieved June 24, 2009.
• ^ Guillermo del Toro Leaves The Hobbit, So Whats Next for the Director? – MTV. MTV. Archived from the original on November 19, 2016. Retrieved November 19, 2016.
• ^ Frappier, Rob (June 24, 2009). Doug Jones Talks Frankenstein, The Hobbit, & Hellboy 3. Screen Rant. Archived from the original on June 28, 2009. Retrieved June 24, 2009.
• ^ Guillermo del Toros Frankenstein Monster Was Hauntingly Beautiful, Says Doug Jones. Collider. October 29, 2020. Archived from the original on December 2, 2021. Retrieved February 3, 2024.
• ^ Jagernauth, Kevin (July 6, 2013). Guillermo Del Toro Wants Benedict Cumberbatch For Frankenstein, Charlie Kaufman Writing Slaughterhouse-Five. IndieWire. Archived from the original on October 10, 2023. Retrieved October 8, 2023.
• ^ Chitwood, Adam (July 17, 2014). Guillermo del Toro Says Universal Wants Him to Do FRANKENSTEIN
• Would Like to See the Universal Monster Universe Done as Period Movies. Collider. Retrieved March 3, 2024.
• ^ Weintraub, Steve (July 25, 2020). Guillermo del Toro and Scott Cooper on Antlers and Filmmaking Comic-Con@Home 2020 (video). YouTube. Comic-Con International. Archived from the original on February 3, 2024. Retrieved November 2, 2023.
• ^ Shanfeld, Ethan (March 15, 2023). Guillermo del Toro Eyes Andrew Garfield, Oscar Isaac, Mia Goth for Frankenstein Movie at Netflix. Variety. Archived from the original on March 15, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
• ^ Weintraub, Steve
• Jones, Tamera (October 9, 2023). Watch Guillermo del Toro Talk Pacific Rim, Frankenstein, His Jabba the Hut Movie, and More in Hour-Long Interview Exclusive. Collider. Archived from the original on October 18, 2023. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
• ^ Kroll, Justin (January 7, 2024). Jacob Elordi To Play Frankenstein Monster In Guillermo Del Toros Adaptation For Netflix
• All Quiet On The Western Front Breakout Felix Kammerer & Sweet Tooth Star Christian Convery Also In Ensemble. Deadline Hollywood. Archived from the original on January 22, 2024. Retrieved January 25, 2024.
• ^ a b Rubin, Rebecca (January 7, 2024). Jacob Elordi to Play Frankensteins Monster in Guillermo del Toros Netflix Adaptation. Variety. Archived from the original on January 8, 2024. Retrieved January 25, 2024.; ^ a b Kantorowicz, Asymina (January 24, 2024). Guillermo Del Toro & The Cast Of The New Frankenstein Film Stopped By A Toronto Restaurant. Narcity Media. Archived from the original on January 24, 2024. Retrieved January 24, 2024.; ^ Ralph Ineson Has a Pivotal Cameo in Guillermo del Toros Frankenstein. Bloody Disgusting. April 15, 2024. Retrieved April 16, 2024.

Is The Bride of Frankenstein better than the original?

Bride is a sequel to Universals 1931 hit Frankenstein. The axiom that sequels are never as good as the originals generally holds true, but there are exceptions: Tarzan and His Mate, After the Thin Man, From Russia With Love, The Godfather Part II and The Empire Strikes Back, for example. It is widely conceded that Bride is one of these successes, although not everyone agrees. Even Whale and his star, Boris Karloff, preferred the original, which represented a crucial turning point in their careers. Karloff argued that it was a mistake in the sequel to have the Monster speak, that too much sympathy was built up for the Monster, and that the use of musical scoring was intrusive. (Frankenstein has often been criticized for its lack of music by modern writers who fail to consider that in 1931, background music was considered an outmoded artifact of the Silent Era.) Some lovers of horror films prefer their horrors unleavened by humor.

After the success of Frankenstein, Universal quickly announced The Return of Frankenstein for the 1932-33 season. Whale was adamant that he wanted no part of the project. The New Adventures of Frankenstein, a treatment by a Frankenstein scenarist, Robert Florey, was rejected in February of 1932 by the youthful studio chief, Carl Laemmle, Jr. In 1933, director Kurt Neumann, a Laemmle protege from Germany, was put in charge of developing the project as a vehicle for Karloff and Bela Lugosi. Scenario editor Tom Reed wrote another treatment, and Philip MacDonald, Edmund Pearson and Lawrence G. Blochman were among the distinguished authors who became involved. Playwright John L. Balderston, author of Berkeley Square and co-author of Frankenstein, created a prologue involving Mary and Percy Shelley and Lord Byron. The bulk of Balderstons treatment, in which the Bride is created from the oversized head of a circus freak and womens body parts rifled from train wrecks, was deemed too gruesome for consideration.

Meantime, numerous writers were trying unsuccessfully to deliver a satisfactory screenplay of H. G. Wells The Invisible Man. Whale persuaded Laemmle to offer the assignment to a friend of his in London, R.C. Sherriff, an Oxford don who had authored the successful play Journeys End. As planned, Whale asked to direct Sherriffs adaptation (arguably the finest fantasy script of the decade) instead of the Frankenstein project. He insisted that Junior Laemmle take the script home, and, after a good dinner, read it in its entirety. He was aware that this request would irritate Laemmle, who never worked after his evening meal. In his autobiography, No Leading Lady, Sherriff writes that Whale told him, If they score a hit with a picture, they always want to do it again. Theyve got a perfectly sound commercial reason. Frankenstein was a gold mine at the box office, and a sequel to it is bound to win, however rotten it is. Theyve had a script made for a sequel, and it stinks to heaven. In any case, I squeezed the idea dry on the original picture, and never want to work on it again.

Why did the bride of Frankenstein hiss?

For those that have never actually seen 1935s The Bride of Frankenstein, let me get you up to speed. The titular Bride is given barely any screen time, appearing for roughly three whole minutes. Dr. Frankenstein reanimates the body of a companion for his misunderstood monster and upon her awakening, is immediately horrified by everything around her. She hisses at the monster who cries out, “she hate me like the others” and proceeds to tear apart the entire laboratory and tower. He kills them both by blowing up the lab, but not before telling her “we belong dead.” They die. The end.

For a movie called “The Bride of Frankenstein,” the film surely doesnt give a single warm shit about the titular character or how she feels about becoming a Bride. The source material (Mary Shelleys Frankenstein) doesnt do her many favors either, existing as a bargaining chip for the monster as the only way hell agree to leave society. The would-be Bride never even gets the chance to live once again because Dr. Frankenstein has a change of heart after thinking about the possibility of his two creations making monster babies and destroying all of humanity and elects not to reanimate her.

Look, I get it. Universal needed to shoehorn in a female character into its Universal monster camp group like a state college pamphlet trying to boast diversity, but its never sat well with me that the Bride was the choice. First of all, Countess Marya Zaleska of Draculas Daughter fame has a whole-ass movie and character arc, not to mention a heart wrenching story about coming to terms with her own sexuality, compared to the Bride who exists solely as a gift for another character and is immediately killed for daring to have her own autonomy.

Is Guillermo del Toro making a Frankenstein movie?

One of the biggest upcoming Netflix movies we know about is a new horror from director Guillermo del Toro. Known as Frankenstein, Dr. Frankenstein, or more recently, Prodigal Father, heres whats known so far about the upcoming Netflix movie that began filming in March 2024.

Lets quickly rewind to bring you up to speed. Since 2020, Guillermo del Toro has worked exclusively with Netflix under an overall deal. Hes produced two major titles for the streamer thus far, with the Oscar-winning Pinocchio and the anthology horror series Cabinet of Curiosities (both released in 2022).

In early December 2022, in a chat with theVariety Awards Podcast, Guillermo del Toro told them about his next project, saying:

Why was Elizabeth recast in Bride of Frankenstein?

Sources report that Bela Lugosi and Claude Rains were considered, with varying degrees of seriousness, for the role of Frankensteins mentor, Pretorius;13 others report that the role was created specifically for Ernest Thesiger.14 Because of Mae Clarkes ill health, Valerie Hobson replaced her as Henry Frankensteins love interest, Elizabeth.8 Early in production, Whale decided that the same actress cast to play the Bride should also play Mary Shelley in the films prologue, to represent how the story — and horror in general — springs from the dark side of the imagination.15 He considered Brigitte Helm and Phyllis Brooks before deciding on Elsa Lanchester. Lanchester, who had accompanied husband Charles Laughton to Hollywood, had met with only moderate success while Laughton had made a strong impact with several films including The Private Life of Henry VIII (for which he had won an Oscar) and Whales own The Old Dark House. Lanchester had returned alone to London when Whale contacted her to offer her the dual role.16 Lanchester modeled the Brides hissing on the hissing of swans. She gave herself a sore throat while filming the hissing sequence, which Whale shot from multiple angles.17.

Colin Clive and Boris Karloff reprised their roles from Frankenstein as creator and creation, respectively. Hobson recalled Clives alcoholism had worsened since filming the original, but Whale did not recast the role because his hysterical quality was necessary for the film.15 Karloff strongly objected to the decision to allow the Monster to speak: Speech! Stupid! My argument was that if the monster had any impact or charm, it was because he was inarticulate – this great, lumbering, inarticulate creature. The moment he spoke you might as well… play it straight.18 This decision also meant that Karloff could not remove his dental plate, so now his cheeks did not have the sunken look of the original film.8 Whale and the studio psychiatrist selected 44 simple words for the Monsters vocabulary by looking at test papers of ten-year-olds working at the studio.5 Dwight Frye returned to play the doctors assistant, Karl, having played the hunchback Fritz in the original. Frye also filmed a scene as an unnamed villager and the role of Nephew Glutz, a man who murdered his uncle and blamed the death on the Monster.8 Boris Karloff is credited simply as KARLOFF, which was Universals custom during the height of his career.19 Elsa Lanchester is credited for Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley, but in a nod to the earlier film, the Monsters bride is credited only as ? just as Boris Karloff had been in the opening credits of Frankenstein.

Universal makeup artist Jack Pierce paid special attention to the Monsters appearance in this film. He altered his 1931 design to display the after-effects of the mill fire, adding scars and shortening the Monsters hair.19 Over the course of filming, Pierce modified the Monsters makeup to indicate that the Monsters injuries were healing as the film progressed.8 Pierce co-created the Brides makeup with strong input from Whale, especially regarding the Brides iconic hair style,16 based on Nefertiti.9 Lanchesters hair was given a Marcel wave over a wire frame to achieve the style.8 Lanchester disliked working with Pierce, who she said really did feel that he made these people, like he was a god… in the morning hed be dressed in white as if he were in hospital to perform an operation.9 To play Mary Shelley, Lanchester wore a white net dress embroidered with sequins of butterflies, stars, and moons, which the actress had heard required 17 women 12 weeks to make.5 Lanchester said of her bride costume: I drank as little liquid as possible. It was too much of an ordeal to go to the bathroom all those bandages and having to be accompanied by my dresser.20.

Are they remaking the Bride of Frankenstein?

Bride of Frankenstein, a classic horror icon, is making a return to cinemas. Scheduled to start filming in early 2024 after delays, its a standalone piece, distancing itself from the Dark Universe Franchise.

The Bride of Frankenstein is making a return to cinemas, marking a revival for this classic horror character. Heres a comprehensive update on what to expect from the upcoming movie.

Release Details. The release date for Bride of Frankenstein is yet to be announced, but filming is scheduled to commence in the first quarter of 2024. This follows delays caused by developmental changes and recent strikes from SAG-AFTRA. Notably, the film will be distinct from the Dark Universe Franchise initiated by Tom Cruises The Mummy in 2017.

Cast Members. The confirmed cast includes Jessie Buckley, Christian Bale, Peter Saarsgard, Penélope Cruz, and Annette Bening. Maggie Gyllenhaal, renowned for her role in The Dark Knight, is set to direct the movie after extensive developmental adjustments.

Why did The Bride of Frankenstein hiss?

For those that have never actually seen 1935s The Bride of Frankenstein, let me get you up to speed. The titular Bride is given barely any screen time, appearing for roughly three whole minutes. Dr. Frankenstein reanimates the body of a companion for his misunderstood monster and upon her awakening, is immediately horrified by everything around her. She hisses at the monster who cries out, “she hate me like the others” and proceeds to tear apart the entire laboratory and tower. He kills them both by blowing up the lab, but not before telling her “we belong dead.” They die. The end.

For a movie called “The Bride of Frankenstein,” the film surely doesnt give a single warm shit about the titular character or how she feels about becoming a Bride. The source material (Mary Shelleys Frankenstein) doesnt do her many favors either, existing as a bargaining chip for the monster as the only way hell agree to leave society. The would-be Bride never even gets the chance to live once again because Dr. Frankenstein has a change of heart after thinking about the possibility of his two creations making monster babies and destroying all of humanity and elects not to reanimate her.

Look, I get it. Universal needed to shoehorn in a female character into its Universal monster camp group like a state college pamphlet trying to boast diversity, but its never sat well with me that the Bride was the choice. First of all, Countess Marya Zaleska of Draculas Daughter fame has a whole-ass movie and character arc, not to mention a heart wrenching story about coming to terms with her own sexuality, compared to the Bride who exists solely as a gift for another character and is immediately killed for daring to have her own autonomy.

Which movie is better, Frankenstein or Bride of Frankenstein?

Arguably the greatest of all the films inspired by Whales original Frankenstein, Bride of Frankenstein is a direct sequel. But Bride is actually livelier and funnier than the first film, while generating even more sympathy for its hapless monster and creating even more impressive Expressionist visuals. Bride also differs from its predecessor in that it was made after the full implementation of the Hollywood Production Code, and many of its offbeat touches can be attributed to the way Whale fenced with the censors throughout the production of the film, attempting to evade their attempts to water down the contents. Among other things, he did so by introducing a great deal of gay iconography, knowing that the censors would probably not recognize it.

As Bride of Frankenstein begins, we can immediately see that things have changed since the initial Frankenstein. Now, instead of being credited simply as “?,” Karloff is actually credited above the title of the film—though only by his last name. Then, a brief credits sequence (accompanied by Franz Waxmans dramatic title music), ends with a cast list that includes the enigmatic entry: “The Monsters Mate,” credited now to “?,” as the Monster was in the first film. Meanwhile, the music itself shifts at the end of the credits to a Romantic theme that will run throughout the film. The music then becomes dramatic again as the film cuts to a rather Gothic mountaintop castle amid a heavy thunderstorm, creating a horror-film atmosphere and producing the expectation that this is the castle of Frankenstein. It quickly becomes clear, though, that this is the castle in Switzerland where Mary Godwin supposedly conceived the idea for her story in during a stay with Lord Byron and her future husband, Percy Bysshe Shelley in 1816. This scene modifies historical reality a bit, suggesting that Mary was already Mary Shelley at this time (she and Percy were married later that year, after the suicide of his first wife), but also suggesting that the first part of the story (entailing the events of the first film) had already been written. This setup allows Byron to give a quick recap of the first film, as we then move into the events of the second. Meanwhile, the suggestion that Mary and Percy are already married might be taken as a nod to the censors, who were by the time of this film fully enforcing the dictates of the Production Code, which forbade the depiction of “immoral” behavior such as the cohabitation of Mary and Percy when he was still married to someone else. Mary herself, meanwhile, delivers a message to the censors with her explanation that, in writing her story, “my purpose was to write a moral lesson of the punishment that befell a mortal man who dared to emulate God.”

The events of Bride of Frankenstein essentially begin where the first film ended, though there is actually a bit of overlap, as Henry has not yet returned to his castle (he is now the baron, his father having somehow disappeared from the scene) when this film begins. He is quickly carted away, though, leaving the burning mill to collapse in ruin. The villagers disperse, assuming the Monster to have been killed in the fire, though Marias father (now played by Reginald Barlow, in one of several casting changes between the two films) insists on seeing the dead Monster for himself. The Monster, of course, is still alive, having taken refuge in a pool of water beneath the mill. Wounded and enraged, the Monster attacks and drowns the father, thus consigning him to the same fate as his daughter. Then, the Monster climbs out of the mill and tosses Marias mother (Mary Gordon) down into the pool, presumably killing her as well.

What does Frankenstein’s bride symbolize?

Frankenstein and Dr. Pretorius – she represents the common Freudian anxieties about the female body and sexuality due to innate fears of castration, and her sexless production by the joint efforts of the two men incites feelings of reverent awe and sheer disgust between them.

Reviewed by Allison Leonard. “Alone – bad. Friend – good!” —Boris Karloff, as Frankenstein’s monster.

James Whale’s 1935 classic, Bride of Frankenstein, expands upon a subplot from Mary Shelley’s original Gothic novel, in which Dr. Frankenstein reluctantly returns to the laboratory and constructs a female companion to subdue his horrific creation. The film’s title, at first glance, suggests a vital importance to the role of the eponymous Bride, and further analysis of the narrative clearly confirms this sentiment. Just as the future of the human race relied on Eve’s cooperation in Christian mythology, humanity also depends upon the Bride for survival within the film’s diegesis. The key difference is that Eve’s partnership with Adam was meant for the procreation of new lives, while the Bride’s intended union with Frankenstein’s monster was for the preservation of existing lives. The monster’s satisfaction with a mate would eliminate his motive for further chaos and destruction, and thus restore peace and harmony to civilized society.

Indeed, for all of the Bride-centered hype and fanfare generated by the film’s gradual build-up to the infamous creation scene, her brief appearance in the last five minutes of running time seems rather anti-climactic. The notorious author Neil Gaiman describes her performance perfectly – “She is revealed; she hisses, screeches, is terrified, is wonderful, and once we have seen her there is nothing left for us.”1 Although the Bride’s overall significance in this film is by no means diminished, the brevity of her on-screen existence begs a few critical questions for scholars and spectators alike – what is the Bride of Frankenstein known for, and how does her meaning contribute to the film? Since her purpose for being has already been established, it is essential to investigate additional dimensions of her identity, aside from the obvious why. Her principle relevance in a film that’s abundant with Christian symbolism, queer interpretations, and feminist themes consequently earns her the right to be perceived as a more fleshed-out character by all who would otherwise question her presence.